BANK-DEPOSITS METHOD ACCEPTABLE TO DETERMINE INCOME.
Guillo, Joseph L., Sr. v. Comm.
- Case NameJOSEPH L. GUILLO, SR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
- CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- DocketNo. 98-70418
- Judgeper curiam
- Cross-ReferenceGuillo v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-40 (For a summary, see Tax
- Parallel Citation165 F.3d 91599-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50,11082 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 98-71971998 U.S. App. LEXIS 30066
- Code Sections
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Index Termsgross income, methods of proofTax Court, appeal
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 1998-34753 (2 original pages)
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation1998 TNT 233-9
Guillo, Joseph L., Sr. v. Comm.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM 1
Agency [sic] No. 24225-95
ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER
OF THE UNITED STATES TAX COURT
Submitted November 16, 1998 2
Before: Farris, Brunetti, and Silverman, Circuit Judges.
[1] Taxpayer Joseph Guillo appeals pro se the tax court's grant of summary judgment for the Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("CIR") in Guillo's action contesting the CIR's determinations of tax deficiencies for tax years 1986 through 1990. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. section 7482. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, Estate of Rapp v. Commissioner, 140 F.3d 1211, 1214 (9th Cir. 1998); Talley Indus. Inc. v. Commissioner, 116 F.3d 382, 385 (9th Cir. 1997), and affirm.
[2] The CIR presented evidence of bank deposits made into Guillo's accounts and used the bank deposit method to establish Guillo's income for the years in question. The CIR subtracted deposits that it determined to be non-income and separated income from verifiable sources such as Social Security, interest, and rental income. Guillo argues that the bank deposits are not proof of his income. However, the bank deposit method is an acceptable method of determining income to establish the existence of an income tax deficiency and the CIR met its burden of proving deficiencies for the tax years in question. See United States v. Stone, 770 F.2d 842, 844 (9th Cir. 1985) (holding that the government may use the bank deposit method to establish a deficiency to support a conviction for attempted income tax evasion).
[3] AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
1 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
2 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4.
END OF FOOTNOTES
- Case NameJOSEPH L. GUILLO, SR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
- CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- DocketNo. 98-70418
- Judgeper curiam
- Cross-ReferenceGuillo v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-40 (For a summary, see Tax
- Parallel Citation165 F.3d 91599-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50,11082 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 98-71971998 U.S. App. LEXIS 30066
- Code Sections
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Index Termsgross income, methods of proofTax Court, appeal
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 1998-34753 (2 original pages)
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation1998 TNT 233-9