Domenici Opening Statement at Budget Markup
Domenici Opening Statement at Budget Markup
- AuthorsDomenici, Sen. Pete V.
- Institutional AuthorsU.S. SenateBudget Committee
- Cross-Reference
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Index Termslegislation, taxbudget, federaltax reliefMedicare
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 1999-10362 (2 original pages)
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation1999 TNT 52-65
=============== FULL TEXT ===============
SENATE BUDGET COMMITTEE
March 16, 1999
[1] I will be brief, I am sure we will have time to discuss these issues more fully over the course of the next few days. I think it is fair to conclude that the President's budget plan for 2000 and beyond has been somewhat of a disappointment to many.
[2] As more information has become available since the release of the President's Budget in early February it has become clear that the President's proposal to address the issues of Social Security and Medicare -- the two most important programs that confront our otherwise bright fiscal outlook -- has been quite frankly without substance.
[3] Allocating more IOU's to these programs does not in any way address more fundamental reforms that are required to maintain benefits for our aging population in the next century.
[4] Indeed, the National Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare, that we established in the 1997 Budget Agreement, has failed in part today because of a lack of support from the Administration's appointees to address the fundamental problems of the program's design.
[5] I understand that a bipartisan, simple majority of the Commission, supports changes that -- while providing for additional prescription drug benefits -- nevertheless foresees changes that would reduce the cost of the program by nearly $100 billion over the life of the resolution we will be marking up here. I believe we can do better than the President's non-budget.
[6] I have set out four basic principles for the 2000 budget. These are:
1. Preserve the social security trust fund balances. Do not
spend the trust funds -- as the President's budget does -- do
not use them to support tax cuts -- as some in my party have
advocated. Do one thing with them -- retire the debt load on
the American public.
2. Maintain the fiscal discipline of the historic 1997
Bipartisan Budget Agreement that I believe every one that was
here at the time supported, including the Ranking Member. Yes
this will be tough, but it can be done. We must set
priorities within the overall spending limits we have, and we
must work hard to stick to them.
[7] I believe we can do this -- the Senate Democratic Leader in response to a question from Cokie Roberts back on February 28 said: "We've got to live within those caps. We've set them out, we all voted for them, we agreed to them. We knew the ramifications when we did so." I couldn't say it any better, except to say that if we are willing to set some priorities, I believe we can stay within the caps while providing additional resources to our elementary and secondary schools.
3. Return to the working Americans -- many who are filling out
their tax forms this month -- overpayments in taxes not
needed to fund priority federal programs.
4. And finally, 10 years is a long time. Almost half the life of
the Budget Act. We need to be realistic that unforseen events
-- indeed changes in economic forecasts -- disasters and
contingencies will certainly occur over this period. We
should be cautious and therefore, allow for non-social
security surpluses to further retire debt or help fund
transition costs to fundamental reforms in the Medicare
program. The Mark I will present will set aside nearly $132
billion in additional non-social security surpluses for these
contingencies or further debt reduction.
[8] The budget plan I will present to the Committee later today, on behalf of the Republican Senate and House Leadership, and I believe all Republican Members of this Committee, sticks with these principles and allows the process to move forward expeditiously this year.
[9] Senator Lautenberg I look forward to working with you as we proceed this week.
- AuthorsDomenici, Sen. Pete V.
- Institutional AuthorsU.S. SenateBudget Committee
- Cross-Reference
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Index Termslegislation, taxbudget, federaltax reliefMedicare
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 1999-10362 (2 original pages)
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation1999 TNT 52-65