IPT Files an Amicus Brief With U.S. Supreme Court Supporting Direct Marketing Association

IPT Files an Amicus Brief With U.S. Supreme Court Supporting Direct Marketing Association

The Institute for Professionals in Taxation filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl arguing that the Tax Injunction Act does not bar federal jurisdiction in challenges to secondary aspects of tax administration, like notice and reporting requirements, where the outcome will not affect any taxpayer.

Tenth Circuit decision <a href="/lr/resolve//1jkr"> <img src="//s3.amazonaws.com/binary.taxnotes.com/image/etl/doclink.gif" border="0" alt="2013 STT 162-2: Court Opinions"/></a> Brief of Direct Marketing Association <a href="/lr/resolve//1wkq"> <img src="//s3.amazonaws.com/binary.taxnotes.com/image/etl/doclink.gif" border="0" alt="2014 STT 175-10: Supreme Court Briefs"/></a>

The Institute for Professionals in Taxation filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl arguing that the Tax Injunction Act does not bar federal jurisdiction in challenges to secondary aspects of tax administration, like notice and reporting requirements, where the outcome will not affect any taxpayer.