ATTORNEYS RECOMMEND CHANGE IN EFFECTIVE DATE OF PROPOSED S CORP. PROVISION.
ATTORNEYS RECOMMEND CHANGE IN EFFECTIVE DATE OF PROPOSED S CORP. PROVISION.
- AuthorsWold, Mary KateZimet, Lee G.
- Institutional AuthorsShearman & Sterling
- Index TermsS corporations, definitions
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 92-8353
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation92 TNT 184-39
=============== SUMMARY ===============
Mary Kate Wold and Lee G. Zimet of Shearman & Sterling, New York, have written concerning section 4604(b) of H.R. 11, which would permit S corporations to hold subsidiaries and which is proposed to be effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 1991. The authors assume that the intent behind the effective date is to allow a corporation that currently has subsidiaries to elect subchapter S status for the current tax year. However, they point out, the bill in its current form may not achieve that result because the deadline for electing S status may have already passed. For example, the deadline for a calendar-year corporation to elect S status for the 1992 tax year expired on March 16, 1992. Therefore, Wold and Zimet suggest a change in the legislative language that would allow a corporation to make an S election within two and one-half months of the enactment of the bill.
=============== FULL TEXT ===============
August 12, 1992
Ms. Janice Mays
Chief Tax Counsel
Committee on Ways & Means
House of Representatives
1105 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
Mr. Sam Sessions
Chief Tax Counsel, Majority Office
Committee on Finance
United States Senate
205 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Mr. Harry L. Gutman
Chief of Staff
Joint Committee on Taxation
United States Congress
1015 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Sir or Madam:
We are writing with regard to the Subchapter S simplification provisions of H.R. 11. Section 4604(b) of the bill, as passed by the House of Representatives, would change current law by permitting S corporations to hold subsidiaries. The proposed effective date for the amendment is for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1991.
We assume that the intent behind the above effective date is to allow a corporation that currently has subsidiaries to elect subchapter S status for the current taxable year. However, the bill in its current form may not achieve this result because the deadline for electing S corporation status may have already passed. For example, the deadline for a calendar year corporation to elect S corporation status for the 1992 taxable year expired on March 16, 1992.
To allow the intended beneficiaries of this legislation to be able to elect S corporation status for the current taxable year, the effective date provisions should be changed to add the following provision:
(3) Subchapter S election -- If a corporation becomes a small business corporation (as defined in section 1361(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) solely as a result of the amendments made by subsection (b), any election under section 1362(a) of such Code made before the close of the 75th day after the date of the enactment of this Act shall be treated as having been made on or before the 15th day of the 3d month of the first taxable year beginning after December 31, 1991.
Such a change would allow corporations to make an S corporation election within 2 1/2 months of the enactment of the bill. If this change is not made, the statute would have the ironic effect of rewarding those taxpayers that made an election without realizing that S corporations may not hold subsidiaries. Taxpayers that complied with the statute would effectively be put at a disadvantage and would have to wait until the next taxable year to elect. If you have any questions please feel free to call Mary Kate Wold at (212) 848-4496 or Lee G. Zimet at (212) 848-5103.
Mary Kate Wold
Lee G. Zimet
Shearman & Sterling
New York, New York
cc: Ms. Shirley D. Peterson
Ms. Terrill A. Byde
Ms. Gayle G. Morin
- AuthorsWold, Mary KateZimet, Lee G.
- Institutional AuthorsShearman & Sterling
- Index TermsS corporations, definitions
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 92-8353
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation92 TNT 184-39