British Virgin Islands Company Disputes 20 Years of Deficiencies
Accipitor Trading Ltd. v. Commissioner
- Case NameAccipitor Trading Ltd. v. Commissioner
- CourtUnited States Tax Court
- DocketNo. 18842-19
- Institutional AuthorsSideman & Bancroft LLP
- Code Sections
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Jurisdictions
- Tax Analysts Document Number2019-40478
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2019 TNTF 207-202019 TNTI 207-22
Accipitor Trading Ltd. v. Commissioner
ACCIPITOR TRADING, LTD.,
Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent.
UNITED STATES TAX COURT
PETITION
Petitioner hereby petitions for a redetermination of the deficiencies set forth by the Commissioner in the Notices of Deficiency dated May 23, 2019, and as the basis for its case alleges as follows:
1. The petitioner is a British Virgin Islands corporation. Petitioner's primary place of business and address is Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. The Notices in this case were issued to Petitioner at 18570 Sobey Road, Saratoga, California 95070, which is a property owned by petitioner. The petitioner did not file tax returns for the periods here involved.
2. The Notices of Deficiency ("Notices") (copies of which, including so much of the statements and schedules accompanying the Notices as are material, are attached hereto and marked Exhibits A and B) were mailed to petitioner on May 23, 2019, and were issued by the Internal Revenue Service at San Jose, California. The Notice at Exhibit A pertains to the 1998 to 2009 years and the Notice at Exhibit B pertains to the 2010 to 2017 years.
3. The Commissioner determined deficiencies in income tax and additions to tax in the Notices, all of which are in dispute, as follows:
Year | Tax | 6651(A)(1) | 6651(a)(2) | 6655 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1998 | $53,640 | $12,069 | $13,410 | $2,471 |
1999 | $55,260 | $12,433 | $13,815 | $2,668 |
2000 | $56,880 | $12,798 | $14,220 | $3,072 |
2001 | $59,220 | $13,324 | $14,805 | $2,364 |
2002 | $60,300 | $13,567 | $15,075 | $2,053 |
2003 | $61,560 | $13,851 | $15,390 | $1,600 |
2004 | $63,720 | $14,337 | $15,930 | $1,820 |
2005 | $65,880 | $14,823 | $16,470 | $2,642 |
2006 | $68,040 | $15,309 | $17,010 | $3,230 |
2007 | $70,200 | $15,795 | $17,550 | $3,245 |
2008 | $66,780 | $15,025 | $16,695 | $2,179 |
2009 | $65,880 | $14,823 | $16,470 | $1,584 |
2010 | $67,860 | $15,795 | $3,510 | $1,955 |
2011 | $65,880 | $14,823 | $16,470 | $1,323 |
2012 | $70,200 | $15,795 | $17,550 | $1,264 |
2013 | $70,200 | $15,795 | $17,550 | $1,266 |
2014 | $70,200 | $15,795 | $16,497 | $1,266 |
2015 | $74,880 | $16,848 | $13,104 | $1,355 |
2016 | $72,360 | $16,281 | $7,959 | $1,983 |
2017 | $70,200 | $15,795 | $3,510 | $1,955 |
4. The determinations set forth in the Notices of Deficiency are based upon the following errors:
a. Respondent erred in determining that petitioner had rental income in the below listed years in the following amounts:
Year | Income |
---|---|
1998 | $178,800 |
1999 | $184,200 |
2000 | $189,600 |
2001 | $197,400 |
2002 | $201,000 |
2003 | $205,200 |
2004 | $212,400 |
2005 | $219,600 |
2006 | $226,800 |
2007 | $234,000 |
2008 | $222,600 |
2009 | $219,600 |
2010 | $226,200 |
2011 | $219,600 |
2012 | $234,000 |
2013 | $234,000 |
2014 | $234,000 |
2015 | $249,600 |
2016 | $241,200 |
2017 | $234,000 |
b. Respondent erred in determining the fair rental value of the properties at issue and the amount of rental income.
c. For the 2001 to 2009 tax years, respondent erred in determining in the alternative that petitioner had income related to "U.S. sourced unexplained deposits."
d. Respondent erred in determining that petitioner is subject to penalties under Section 6651(a)(1) and (a)(2) and 6655.
5. The facts upon which petitioner relies as the basis of its case are as follows:
a. Petitioner did not have rental income in the amounts shown in the Notices.
b. Rental income should only reflect the properties actually occupied in the years at issue.
c. The fair rental value of the properties at issue was lower than determined by respondent.
d. The failure to file returns and pay taxes and estimated taxes was due to reasonable cause.
e. Any "U.S. source unexplained deposits" were not income to petitioner.
WHEREFORE, it is prayed that:
1) The Court may hear the case and determine that the deficiencies in tax determined by respondent are erroneous;
2) The Court determine that petitioner is not liable for any penalties; and
3) The Court grant such other and further relief as may be appropriate.
DATED: October 17, 2019
Steven M. Katz
Tax Court No. KSO374
Attorneys for Petitioner
SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP
One Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415-392-1960
Facsimile: 415-392-0827
DATED: October 17, 2019
Travis W. Thompson
Tax Court No. TT0226
Attorneys for Petitioner
SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP
One Embarcadero Center
22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415-392-1960
Facsimile: 415-392-0827
DATED: October 17, 2019
Jay R. Weill
Tax Court No. WJ0279
Attorneys for Petitioner
SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP
One Embarcadero Center
22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415-392-1960
Facsimile: 415-392-0827
- Case NameAccipitor Trading Ltd. v. Commissioner
- CourtUnited States Tax Court
- DocketNo. 18842-19
- Institutional AuthorsSideman & Bancroft LLP
- Code Sections
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Jurisdictions
- Tax Analysts Document Number2019-40478
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2019 TNTF 207-202019 TNTI 207-22