Menu
Tax Notes logo

Partnership Seeks Readjustments in Production Activities Case

MAR. 30, 2021

Print Media LLC et al. v. Commissioner

DATED MAR. 30, 2021
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES

Print Media LLC et al. v. Commissioner

[Editor's Note:

An exhibit can be viewed in the PDF version of the document.

]

PRINT MEDIA LLC, Partnership, CERBERUS YP LLC, Tax Matters Partner
Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent.

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

PETITION FOR READJUSTMENT OF PARTNERSHIP ITEMS PURSUANT TO CODE SECTION 6226

Petitioner, Cerberus YP LLC (“Cerberus YP”), pursuant to Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) Section 6226 (as applicable for the tax year at issue) and Rule 241 of the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, hereby petitions to readjust the partnership items set forth by respondent, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the “Commissioner”) with respect to the partnership items of Print Media LLC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2015 (the “2015 Tax Year”), stated in the Notice of Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment dated January 4, 2021 (the “FPAA”), and in support thereof states as follows:

PARTIES AND JURISDICTION

1. During the 2015 Tax Year, Print Media LLC (“Print Media” and/or the “Partnership”) was a Delaware limited liability company. Its principal office and principal place of business was located at 2247 Northlake Parkway, Tucker, Georgia 30084.

2. Cerberus YP was organized under Delaware law. Its principal office is: c/o Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. 875 Third Avenue, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

3. During the 2015 Tax Year, Print Media was taxed as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes, and had eight Limited Members with the following percentages of ownership: (1) YP Western Holdings Corporation (15.16 percent); YP Southeast Holdings Corporation (29.417 percent); YP Midwest Holdings Corporation (14.73 percent); YP Connecticut Holdings Corporation (2.32 percent); Plusmo Holdings Corporation (3.35 percent); Ingenio Holdings Corporation (5.93 percent); YP Intermediate Holdings Corporation (0.013 percent). Print Media Holdings LLC was the Managing Member of Print Media, and had a 29.08 percent ownership interest in Print Media.

4. On August 13. 2019 the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) designated Cerberus YP as the Tax Matters Partner of Print Media pursuant to Code section 6231(a)(7) and Treasury Regulation § 301.6231(a)(7)-1.

5. Print Media timely filed its Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, for the 2015 Tax Year with the Service Center in Ogden, Utah.

6. During the 2015 Tax Year, Print Media maintained its books and records, and filed its federal tax returns on an accrual method of accounting.

8. The FPAA was issued by the Ogden, Utah Service Center, and relates to the 2015 Tax Year. The FPAA is dated January 4, 2021. A copy of the FPAA for the 2015 Tax Year is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

9. Respondent is the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

10. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Code section 6226 (as applicable for the 2015 Tax Year).

ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR

11. With respect to the 2015 Tax Year, the Commissioner erroneously determined that Print Media did not have the “benefits and burdens of ownership” under a contract manufacturing arrangement with a third-party, and for purposes of the “domestic production activities deduction” (“DPAD”) in Code section 199:

a. Adjusted Print Media's “domestic production gross receipts” (“DPGR”) and “qualified production activities income” (“QPAI”) to zero;

b. Decreased Print Media's DPGR by $438,868,226;

c. Decreased cost of goods sold allocable to DPAD by $160,606,203;

d. Decreased Print Media's “Selling, General and Administrative” or “SG&A” expenses allocable to DPGR by $156,104,245;

e. Decreased Print Media's “Single Category Assets — DPGR” used in the calculation of Print Media's DPAD by $196,853,502; and

f. Decreased Print Media's interest expense used in the calculation of the DPAD by $22,671,136.

12. Implicit in the Commissioner's adjustments for the 2015 Tax Year is his erroneous determinations that Print Media has not established that:

a. the Directories (as defined below) were “manufactured” or “produced” by Print Media within the meaning of Code section 199; and

b. it meets all of the requirements for determining QPAI under Code section 199, and that Print Media may pass QPAI through to its partners.

FACTS SUPPORTING READJUSTMENT OF PARTNERSHIP ITEMS

13. The following facts were true and correct during the 2015 Tax Year, and support Cerberus YP's petition for readjustment of partnership items related to the Code section 199 deductions claimed by its partners on their originally filed Federal income tax return:

a. Print Media received gross receipts from the sale of advertisements to third-parties placed in the “Yellow Pages” telephone directories published by Print Media (the “Directories”).

b. Print Media distributed the Directories to residents and businesses for no charge.

c. The Directories were in a tangible, printed form.

d. Print Media designed and caused the Directories to be printed in the United States.

e. Print Media developed and created the Directories (including designing the content and layout of the advertisements), paginated the Directories, created and printed proof pages, and exercised quality control over the entire production process of the Directories.

f. Print Media printed, bound, and shrink-wrapped the Directories using the services of a third-party, contract printer (the “Printer”).

g. Print Media provided the Printer with the design, layout, content, and listings for the Directories, which consisted of paper positives, film positives, film negatives, and electronic data storage.

h. Print Media contracted and purchased the paper on which the Printers printed the Directories from paper suppliers.

i. Print Media warranted that the paper supplied to the Printers was free from defects in material and workmanship, and conformed to Print Media's specifications.

j. Print Media's labor and overhead costs, exclusive of the costs paid to the Printer for printing and binding, were greater than 20 percent of its cost of goods sold.

k. At all times during the printing process, Print Media owned and had legal title to the paper, work-in-progress, and the Directories.

l. At all times, title and ownership of the intellectual property associated with the Directories (including paper positive, film positives, film negatives, and electronic data storage) remained with Print Media during the entirety of the printing process, and never passed to the Printer.

l. No sales tax was collected by or imposed on the Printer with respect to the work-in-progress or the Directories.

m. At all times, Print Media controlled the development of the content, design, and layout of the Directories.

n. At all times, Print Media controlled the creation of the Directories (including instructed the Printer on how to print the Directories).

o. At all times, Print Media determined all specifications for the printing process, including the grade, color, and quality of the paper used.

p. The Printer printed the Directories only according to Print Media's specifications and instructions.

q. Print Media had the right to and did inspect the Directories during the printing process, and it performed quality review of the Directories as they were being printed, including using a “Directory Quality Scorecard” to measure and monitor the production and delivery accuracy.

r. Print Media was responsible for the production schedule, and if the Printer could not meet the production schedule, Print Media could approve the use of overtime for which it was liable to pay.

s. Print Media, and not the Printer, bore all risk for fluctuations in the cost of the paper.

t. Indeed, paper was the predominant raw material used in the creation of the Directories.

u. Print Media bore all risk for fluctuations in the cost of all other manufacturing materials and supplies, including, but not limited to the glue, ink, and shrink wrap.

u. Because it owned and was at risk for the Directories during the printing process, Print Media was a named beneficiary under the terms of the Printer's casualty insurance policies with respect to the Directories.

v. The Printer's risk of loss, if any, consisted primarily of any labor inefficiency and a portion of its overhead costs.

w. Print Media's contract with the Printer had the characteristics of a cost-plus arrangement, and was not contingent or dependent upon how many advertisements Print Media sold.

x. Print Media's contract with the Printer separately stated the costs of labor, ink, glue, and shrink wrap used to print the Directories.

y. Print Media's contract with the Printer was only for printing services and was not a contract to purchase the Directories.

z. The printing services fee that Print Media paid to the Printer was not based on the value of the Directories or the amounts Print Media earned from selling advertisements.

aa. The Printer had no right to use, alter, sell, distribute, or dispose of the Directories or any of their content, and did not acquire any rights to the Directories by virtue of performing its printing services for a fee.

bb. Only Print Media, and not the Printer, had the right to exploit the Directories and the intellectual property associated with them.

cc. Print Media paid and was responsible for all taxes levied and assessed, including property taxes, on the Directories.

dd. Only Print Media, and not the Printer, had the “benefits and burdens of ownership” of the Directories throughout the production process — during the period of their creation, production, and distribution.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Petitioner, Cerberus YP LLC, requests the Court to:

(1) Redetermine the adjustments proposed by the Commissioner in the FPAA;

(2) Determine that the adjustments in the FPAA should not be made to the partnership items reported on the Print Media's Federal tax return for the 2015 Tax Year;

(3) Make all necessary correlative adjustments; and

(4) Grant Petitioner such other further relief to which it may be entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

Kevin Spencer
Tax Court Bar No. ST0461
McDermott Will & Emery LLP
500 North Capitol St., NW
Washington, D.C.
Tel (202) 756-8303
Fax (202) 591.2796
kspencer@mwe.com

Dated: March 30, 2021

DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
Copy RID