Menu
Tax Notes logo

Eighth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Couple’s Tax, Penalty Challenge

MAY 14, 2019

Francis, Brad S. et ux. v. United States

DATED MAY 14, 2019
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    Brad S. Francis et ux. v. United States
  • Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
  • Docket
    No. 18-2988
  • Judge
    Per Curiam
  • Parallel Citation
    770 Fed. Appx. 314
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    2019-18965
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2019 TNT 94-31

Francis, Brad S. et ux. v. United States

[Unpublished]

Brad S. Francis; Christine C. Francis
Plaintiffs–Appellants
v.

United States of America
Defendant–Appellee

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit

Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri Kansas City

Submitted: May 9, 2019
Filed: May 14, 2019

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Brad and Christine Francis appeal the district court's1 dismissal, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, of their civil suit challenging their liability for federal taxes and penalties. Having carefully reviewed the record and the Francises' arguments on appeal, we conclude the court did not err in dismissing the complaint, see Laclede Gas Co. v. St. Charles Cnty., Mo., 713 F.3d 413, 417 (8th Cir. 2013) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction); and that the district court judge did not err by failing to sua sponte recuse himself, see United States v. Melton, 738 F.3d 903, 905 (8th Cir. 2013) (when raised for the first time on appeal, decision not to recuse is reviewed for plain error). Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny the pending appellate motion.

FOOTNOTES

1 The Honorable Greg Kays, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

END FOOTNOTES

DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    Brad S. Francis et ux. v. United States
  • Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
  • Docket
    No. 18-2988
  • Judge
    Per Curiam
  • Parallel Citation
    770 Fed. Appx. 314
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    2019-18965
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2019 TNT 94-31
Copy RID