Ineffective S Corp Election, Termination Inadvertent

Third Party Communication: None
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact: * * *, ID No. * * *
Telephone Number: * * *

Index Numbers: 1362.00-00, 1362.04-00
Release Date: 10/16/2020

Date: July 13, 2020

Refer Reply To: CC:PSI:B03 - PLR-103934-20

LEGEND:

X = * * *
Date 1 = * * *
Date 2 = * * *
Date 3 = * * *
Date 4 = * * *
Date 5 = * * *
Date 6 = * * *
A = * * *
State = * * *

Dear * * *:

This letter responds to a letter dated February 11, 2020, and subsequent correspondence, submitted on behalf of X by X's representatives, requesting relief under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).

FACTS

The information submitted states that X was formed on Date 1 under the laws of State and elected to be treated as an S corporation effective Date 2. X's operating agreement effective Date 2 contained terms causing X to have more than one class of stock under § 1361(b)(1)(D). Specifically, the agreement provided for the maintenance of capital accounts in accordance with § 704(b) and required X to make certain special allocations to the extent necessary to satisfy the alternate test for substantial economic effect. The agreement further required X to make liquidating distributions in proportion to each member's positive capital account balance rather than pro rata based on membership interests. Thus, X's S corporation election effective Date 2 was ineffective.

On Date 3 and Date 4, X amended and restated its operating agreement. However, the amended and restated operating agreements still contained the same terms that caused X to have more than one class of stock on Date 2. Additionally, on Date 5, X further amended and restated its operating agreement to authorize the creation of profits interest units, thus creating an additional second class of stock. Also, on Date 5, X issued profits interest units to A, an individual. Thus, had X's S corporation election been effective on Date 2, it would have terminated on Date 3, Date 4, and Date 5 as a result of X having more than one class of stock under § 1361(b)(1)(D) had it not otherwise terminated on each of those dates.

X represents that once it learned that its S corporation was ineffective, it cancelled A's profits interest units and amended and restated its operating agreement effective Date 6 to remove the terms causing X to have more than one class of stock under § 1361(b)(1)(D).

X represents that the circumstances surrounding X's ineffective S corporation election, as well as any subsequent termination, were inadvertent and unintended. X further represents that for each taxable year since Date 2, X and its shareholders have filed consistently with X being an S corporation. In addition, X and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments required as a condition of obtaining relief under the inadvertent termination rule as provided under § 1362(f) as may be required by the Secretary.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for the year.

Section 1361(b)(1) defines a “small business corporation” as a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not (A) have more than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than one class of stock.

Section 1.1361-1(l)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that a corporation is generally treated as having only one class of stock if all outstanding shares of stock of the corporation confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds.

Section 1.1361-1(l)(2)(i) provides, in part, that the determination of whether all outstanding shares of stock confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds is made based on the corporate charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws, applicable state law, and binding agreements relating to distribution and liquidation proceeds (collectively, governing provisions).

Section 1362(a)(1) provides that, except as provided in § 1362(g), a small business corporation may elect to be an S corporation.

Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for which the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business corporation. Section 1362(d)(2)(B) further provides that the termination shall be effective on and after the date of cessation.

Section 1362(f) provides, in relevant part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which the election was made or the termination occurred is a small business corporation, and (4) the corporation for which the election was made or the termination occurred, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

CONCLUSION

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that X's S corporation election was ineffective on Date 2 as a result of X having more than one class of stock. In addition, we conclude that had X's S corporation election been effective, it would have terminated on Date 3, Date 4, and Date 5 as a result of X having more than one class of stock had it not otherwise terminated on each of those dates. We conclude, however, that the ineffectiveness and terminations described in this paragraph were inadvertent within the meaning of §1362(f). Therefore, under § 1362(f), X will be treated an S corporation effective Date 2 and thereafter, provided that its S corporation election has not terminated under § 1362(d) other than as discussed in this letter.

Except as specifically ruled upon above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion on whether X is otherwise eligible to be an S corporation.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of this request, it is subject to verification on examination.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

Mary Beth Carchia
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel|
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:
* * *