House Members Urge Preservation of Cash Method of Accounting
House Members Urge Preservation of Cash Method of Accounting
- AuthorsSchneider, Rep. Bradley S.Hudson, Rep. RichardQuigley, Rep. MikeLuetkemeyer, Rep. Blaine
- Institutional AuthorsHouse of Representatives
- Code Sections
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 2014-22252
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2014 TNT 177-42
September 11, 2014
The Honorable John Boehner
Speaker
H-232, U.S. Capitol
Washington, DC 20515
The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Minority Leader
H-204, U.S. Capitol
Washington, DC 20515
The Honorable Kevin McCarthy
Majority Leader
H-329, U.S. Capitol
Washington, DC 20515
The Honorable Steny Hoyer
Minority Whip
H-148, U.S. Capitol
Washington, DC 20515
The Honorable Steve Scalise
Majority Whip
H-207, U.S. Capitol
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Speaker Boehner, Majority Leader McCarthy, Majority Whip Scalise, Minority Leader Pelosi and Minority Whip Hoyer:
We write to ask that you preserve the cash method of accounting for partnerships, pass-through entities, personal-service companies, farmers and ranchers. Proposals requiring a transition from the cash method of accounting to the accrual method of accounting will have a severely detrimental impact on thousands of businesses in our districts. Those who use the cash method of accounting include many of our local job creators and professionals including accountants, architects, attorneys, dentists, engineers, farmers, physicians and financial service professionals. Importantly, the cash method of accounting is the foundation upon which these businesses have built their business models for decades.
The cash method of accounting is a simple method in which income is recognized when it is collected. By comparison, the accrual method of accounting recognizes income when a service is performed, regardless of when cash is collected. Personal service companies, pass-through entities, partnerships, farmers and ranchers rely on the cash method because they typically do not have the benefit of matching revenues to expenses, many of which are fixed. Further, the timing for receiving payment is unknown; in fact, payment may not be received for months or years after a product or service is delivered, or it may never be received at all. Under the accrual method, these businesses would be required to pay taxes on income they have not yet received, resulting in these individuals possibly being taxed at a higher tax bracket, or subject to additional taxes. If forced to pay taxes before income is received, as would be required under the accrual method, less money would be available to small businesses for growth and job creation. Additionally, cash flow management becomes far more complex as a result, and will likely trigger the need for additional outside financing. These factors alone would have a significant negative impact on our local economies.
Currently, individuals, certain pass-through entities, and personal service corporations may use the cash method of accounting regardless of size. Generally, C Corporations may use the cash method if average annual gross receipts do not exceed $5 million. While the recent tax reform proposals to increase the threshold to $10 million for C Corporations are encouraging and acknowledge the benefits of the cash method for small businesses, the newly proposed $10 million limit on other entities will discourage growth for businesses that would otherwise expand beyond the threshold either independently or through mergers.
The burden of switching to accrual accounting will be particularly acute in the agriculture sector. Farmers and ranchers rely on the flexibility of cash accounting to accelerate expenses or defer income -- a tool that helps farm businesses cope with volatile commodity prices and weather conditions. Cash accounting gives farmers and ranchers the flexibility they need to manage their tax burden. Requiring agricultural businesses to shift to accrual accounting would likely dramatically reduce working capital and equity available for investment, as well as increase complexity and decrease flexibility for many agricultural businesses.
Many current cash accounting users will be required to take out loans or divert capital that otherwise would be used to grow their businesses in order to pay for this tax increase. It is important to note that several of the adversely affected business sectors are subject to state laws or professional ethics rules which provide structuring requirements or impose other limitations on the ways in which the firms can obtain financing. For example, firm ownership for accountants is restricted by state laws to individuals who actively participate in the business; thus, these firms cannot obtain outside investment capital. Similarly, lawyers must comply with state court ethics rules that generally prohibit them from forming a law firm partnership with a non-lawyer or allowing a non-lawyer to own any interest in the law firm. Therefore, these individual business owners would have to personally shoulder their firms' increased financial burden to pay their taxes earlier under the accrual method.
While we believe reforms to the tax code should provide a simpler and fairer tax system, requiring the use of the accrual method for entities currently using the cash method will not achieve these goals. As we seek to best represent the concerns of the constituents in our districts, we strongly urge you to preserve the cash method of accounting.
Schneider, Bradley S.
Hudson, Richard
Quigley, Mike
Luetkemeyer, Blaine
Aderholt, Robert B.
Amash, Justin
Bachus, Spencer
Barber, Ron
Barr, Andy
Barrow, John
Benishek, Dan
Bentivolio, Kerry L.
Bera, Ami
Bishop, Rob
Bishop, Timothy H.
Bonamici, Suzanne
Bordallo, Madeleine
Braley, Bruce L.
Brooks, Mo
Brooks, Susan W.
Brownley, Julia
Bucshon, Larry
Bustos, Cheri
Byrne, Bradley
Campbell, John
Capito, Shelley
Moor Capps, Lois
Capuano, Michael E.
Cardenas, Tony
Carney, John C, Jr.
Carson, Andre
Carter, John R.
Cartwright, Matt
Cohen, Steve
Collins, Chris
Collins, Doug
Conaway, K. Michael
Connolly, Gerald E.
Cook, Paul
Costa, Jim
Cramer, Kevin
Crawford, Eric A. "Rick"
Cuellar, Henry
Cummings, Elijah E.
Daines, Steve
Davis, Danny K.
Delaney, John K.
DelBene, Susan K.
Denham, Jeff
DeSantis, Ron
DesJarlais, Scott
Deutch, Theodore E.
Diaz-Balart, Mario
Doggett, Lloyd
Duckworth, Tammy
Duffy, Sean P.
Duncan, Jeff
Duncan, John J., Jr.
Edwards, Donna F.
Ellison, Keith
Ellmers, Renee
L. Engel, Eliot L.
Enyart, William L.
Eshoo, Anna G.
Esty, Elizabeth H.
Farenthold, Blake
Gardner, Cory
Gibbs, Bob
Gibson, Christopher P.
Gohmert, Louie
Goodlatte, Bob
Gosar, Paul A.
Gowdy, Trey
Granger, Kay
Graves, Sam
Grijalva, Raul M.
Grimm, Michael G.
Guthrie, Brett
Gutierrez, Luis V.
Hahn, Janice
Hanna, Richard L.
Harper, Gregg
Harris, Andy
Hartzler, Vicky
Hastings, Alcee L.
Heck, Denny
Higgins, Brian
Himes, James A.
Holt, Rush
Honda, Michael M.
Horsford, Steven A,
Hultgren, Randy
Israel, Steve
Johnson, Bill
Jones, Walter B.
Jordan, Jim
Joyce, David P.
Kaptur, Marcy
Keating, William R.
Cassidy, Bill
Castro, Joaquin
Chabot, Steve
Chaffetz, Jason
Chu, Judy
Cicilline, David N.
Clark, Katherine M.
Clawson, Curt
Clay, Wm. Lacy
Cleaver, Emanuel
Coble, Howard
Fattah, Chaka
Fincher, Stephen Lee
Fitzpatrick, Michael G.
Flores, Bill
Foster, Bill Franks,
Trent Fudge,
Marcia L. Gabbard,
Tulsi Gallego, Pete P.
Garamendi, John
Garcia, Joe
Kelly, Robin L.
Kennedy, Joseph P., Ill
Kildee, Daniel T.
Kilmer, Derek
Kind, Ron
King, Steve
King, Peter T.
Kirkpatrick, Ann
Kuster, Ann McLane
LaMalfa, Doug
Larson, John B.
- AuthorsSchneider, Rep. Bradley S.Hudson, Rep. RichardQuigley, Rep. MikeLuetkemeyer, Rep. Blaine
- Institutional AuthorsHouse of Representatives
- Code Sections
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 2014-22252
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2014 TNT 177-42