Menu
Tax Notes logo

Advocacy Groups Oppose Applying Gift Tax to Nonprofit Donors

DEC. 14, 2015

Advocacy Groups Oppose Applying Gift Tax to Nonprofit Donors

DATED DEC. 14, 2015
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Authors
    Altman, Jeffrey P.
    Colvin, Gregory L.
    Dye, Alan P.
    Engle, Craig
    Fei, Rosemary E.
    Gorovitz, Eric
    Keane, Benjamin P.
    Kingsley, Beth
    Kohout, Jason
    Mitchell, Cleta
    Passantino, Stefan
    Pomerantz, John
    Rhomberg, Barbara
    Torchinsky, Jason
    Watkins, Charles M.
    Weiss, Bridget M.
    Yablon, Jeffery L.
    Zall, Barnaby
  • Institutional Authors
    Alliance for Justice
    American Civil Liberties Union
    Center for Competitive Politics
    American Association of University Women Action Fund
    American Principles in Action
    Americans for Tax Reform
    Council for Citizens Against Government Waste
    FreedomWorks Inc.
    Human Rights Campaign
    NAACP National Voter Fund
    Tea Party Patriots
    The Conservative Campaign
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Industry Groups
    Nonprofit sector
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2015-27831
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2015 TNT 243-35

 

December 14, 2015

 

 

The Honorable Orrin Hatch

 

Chairman

 

Senate Finance Committee

 

104 Hart Senate Office Building

 

Washington, DC 20510

 

 

The Honorable Ron Wyden

 

Ranking Member

 

Senate Finance Committee

 

221 Dirksen Senate Office Building

 

Washington, DC 20510

 

 

Dear Chairman Hatch and Ranking Member Wyden:

The undersigned civil liberties, free expression, and nonprofit advocacy groups and attorneys who represent advocacy organizations have a wide variety of views on the political spectrum. However, we are united in writing to express our strong support for the Fair Treatment for All Gifts Act (H.R. 1104), which passed the House by a voice vote on April 15, 2015. The text of this bill is currently under consideration for inclusion in the Tax Extenders legislation being negotiated by Congressional leaders. The undersigned groups have varying views on the merits of any Tax Extenders legislation, but we are united in agreement that the provisions of H.R. 1104 should become law.

Application of the gift tax to 501(c)(4) donors raises serious constitutional questions, and threatens to hamstring smaller or start-up citizens' groups. The provisions in H.R. 1104 would lock in current policy at the Internal Revenue Service that exempts contributors to 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations from the gift tax. We applaud Congress for taking steps to end uncertainty on the question.

Nonprofit organizations play a crucial role in American society by allowing citizens to associate and speak with one voice on a wide variety of important public policy issues. The clarity that would be provided by this legislation would help ensure the continued vitality of these important organizations and would help safeguard taxpayers and nonprofit organizations against unfair or biased treatment by the IRS in the future.

It would also create parity between 501(c)(4) organizations and charities and political groups, which are already exempt from the tax under existing law. There is no sound tax policy reason to impose a gift tax on contributions to 501(c)(4) organizations, which combine features of 501(c)(3) charities and 527 political organizations, while exempting contributions to a 501(c)(3) or 527 organization if it stands alone.

Perhaps more important, however, application of the gift tax in this context would raise serious problems under the rights of free speech and freedom of association guaranteed by the Constitution.

While it is true that the government may opt not to subsidize certain types of activities through tax exemptions or deductions, it may not burden expressive or associational activity through taxation, and the gift tax would present an enormous burden on 501(c)(4) groups. Were it applied, many donors would simply stop giving money to various causes, or would give only up to the annual exclusion of $14,000.

Smaller and less well-resourced nonprofits often rely on larger gifts to exist at all. To the extent the government would be putting some social welfare groups out of business through the imposition of the gift tax, it raises constitutional issues of the highest moment.

Additionally, imposing the gift tax on donors to nonprofit groups could present an unconstitutional condition. While, again, the government may choose not to subsidize certain activities through tax exemptions or deductions, it may not condition the exercise of a constitutional right -- the freedom to associate with social welfare groups by donating money to them -- on payment of the tax.

In light of the current IRS policy that the tax does not apply to such donations, Congress should enact that policy into law, which would protect the First Amendment rights to speak and associate, provide clarity for nonprofit groups, and support the agency on this important issue.

Sincerely,

 

 

Alliance for Justice

 

 

American Civil Liberties Union

 

 

Center for Competitive Politics

 

 

American Association of University

 

Women Action Fund

 

 

American Principles in Action

 

 

Americans for Tax Reform

 

 

Council for Citizens Against

 

Government Waste

 

 

FreedomWorks, Inc.

 

 

Human Rights Campaign

 

 

NAACP National Voter Fund

 

 

Tea Party Patriots

 

 

The Conservation Campaign

 

The undersigned attorneys are doing so in their individual capacity and not on behalf of their law firms.
Jeffrey P. Altman

 

Whiteford Taylor Preston

 

 

Gregory L. Colvin

 

Adler & Colvin

 

 

Alan P. Dye

 

Webster, Chamberlain & Bean, LLP

 

 

Craig Engle

 

Arent Fox LLP

 

 

Rosemary E. Fei

 

Adler & Colvin

 

 

Eric Gorovitz

 

Adler & Colvin

 

 

Benjamin P. Keane

 

Dentons US LLP

 

 

Elizabeth Kingsley

 

Harmon, Curran, Spielberg &

 

Eisenberg, LLP

 

 

Jason Kohout

 

Foley & Lardner LLP

 

 

Cleta Mitchell

 

Foley & Lardner LLP

 

 

Stefan Passantino

 

Dentons US LLP

 

 

John Pomeranz

 

Harmon, Curran, Spielberg &

 

Eisenberg, LLP

 

 

Barbara Rhomberg

 

Law Office of Barbara Rhomberg

 

 

Jason Torchinsky

 

Holtzman Vogel Josefiak Torchinsky

 

PLLC

 

 

Charles M. Watkins

 

Webster, Chamberlain & Bean, LLP

 

 

Bridget M. Weiss

 

Arnold & Porter LLP

 

 

Jeffery L. Yablon

 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman

 

LLP

 

 

Barnaby Zall

 

Weinberg, Jacobs & Tolani, LLP
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Authors
    Altman, Jeffrey P.
    Colvin, Gregory L.
    Dye, Alan P.
    Engle, Craig
    Fei, Rosemary E.
    Gorovitz, Eric
    Keane, Benjamin P.
    Kingsley, Beth
    Kohout, Jason
    Mitchell, Cleta
    Passantino, Stefan
    Pomerantz, John
    Rhomberg, Barbara
    Torchinsky, Jason
    Watkins, Charles M.
    Weiss, Bridget M.
    Yablon, Jeffery L.
    Zall, Barnaby
  • Institutional Authors
    Alliance for Justice
    American Civil Liberties Union
    Center for Competitive Politics
    American Association of University Women Action Fund
    American Principles in Action
    Americans for Tax Reform
    Council for Citizens Against Government Waste
    FreedomWorks Inc.
    Human Rights Campaign
    NAACP National Voter Fund
    Tea Party Patriots
    The Conservative Campaign
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Industry Groups
    Nonprofit sector
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2015-27831
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2015 TNT 243-35
Copy RID