TEI Says Changes to Quill Could Lead to Double Taxation, Burdensome Collection Process in Wayfair Brief

TEI Says Changes to Quill Could Lead to Double Taxation, Burdensome Collection Process in Wayfair Brief

U.S. Supreme Court

Tax Executives Institute

The Tax Executives Institute filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in favor of the respondents in South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc., arguing that a decision that modifies Quill could lead to double taxation, and that retroactive application would effectively transfer the tax burden from consumers to retailers because retailers have no efficient means of collecting tax from the consumers years after their transactions.

The Tax Executives Institute filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in favor of the respondents in South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc., arguing that a decision that modifies Quill could lead to double taxation, and that retroactive application would effectively transfer the tax burden from consumers to retailers because retailers have no efficient means of collecting tax from the consumers years after their transactions.

The Tax Executives Institute filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in favor of the respondents in South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc., arguing that a decision that modifies Quill could lead to double taxation, and that retroactive application would effectively transfer the tax burden from consumers to retailers because retailers have no efficient means of collecting tax from the consumers years after their transactions.

The Tax Executives Institute filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in favor of the respondents in South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc., arguing that a decision that modifies Quill could lead to double taxation, and that retroactive application would effectively transfer the tax burden from consumers to retailers because retailers have no efficient means of collecting tax from the consumers years after their transactions.