Menu
Tax Notes logo

FedEx Comments on Aviation Fuel Tax Guidance

FEB. 25, 2005

FedEx Comments on Aviation Fuel Tax Guidance

DATED FEB. 25, 2005
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Authors
    Wagner, Andrew P.
    Connell, D. Mark
  • Institutional Authors
    FedEx Corporation
  • Cross-Reference
    For Notice 2005-4, 2005-2 IRB 289, see Doc 2004-23794 [PDF]or

    2004 TNT 242-6 2004 TNT 242-6: Internal Revenue Bulletin.
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2005-4881
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2005 TNT 47-29

VIA FEDEX LETTER

 

 

February 25, 2005

 

 

Donald L. Korb, Esq.

 

Chief Counsel

 

Internal Revenue Service

 

CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-153838-04)

 

Courier's Desk

 

1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

 

Washington, D.C. 20224

 

RE: Comments on IRS Notice 2005-4

 

Aviation Fuel Excise Tax Guidance under Section 4081

 

Dear Mr. Korb:

Federal Express Corporation ("FedEx") submits the following comments in response to the request for comments in § 10, Notice 2005-4, 2005-2 I.R.B. 289 (1/10/2005). Notice 2005-4 provides guidance on amendments to the aviation fuel excise tax provisions made by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, including the repeal of section 4091 and the amendments to section 4081. In particular, this letter:

  • Discusses the urgent need for an expedited process by which an unlisted terminal may become listed, even if on a temporary basis;

  • Responds to the request for comments concerning the standards that should be applied to determine whether a fuel terminal is located "within a secured area of an airport";

  • Provides comments concerning what types of situations should be treated as "exigent circumstances" for purposes of section 4081(a)(3)(A)(iv); and

  • Proposes that Treas. Reg. § 48.4081-3(b)(2)(v) be amended to include aviation-grade kerosene.

 

FedEx is the world's largest express cargo airline. Its primary hub is located in Memphis, Tennessee. Memphis International Airport ("MEM") is the world's largest air cargo airport in terms of cargo handled. Fedex owns and operates MEM T-62-TN-2220, which serves only Fedex. MEM T-62-TN-2220 is not included on the Notice 2005-4 list of terminals that are treated as located "within a secured area of an airport" for purposes of section 4081(a)(3)(A)(i) despite that a factually similar terminal used by other carriers at MEM was included on the list (MEM T-62-TN-2212).

 

An Expedited Procedure for Terminals Not on the Approved List is Urgently Needed

 

Notice 2005-4 adopts the list provided by the legislative history (H.Conf. Rpt. No. 108-755 at 692, footnote 718 ("Conference Report")) with three exceptions. It is imperative that guidance be issued immediately, even if on a temporary basis, to permit terminals not included on the initial list announced by Notice 2005-4 to qualify. The lack of guidance for nonlisted terminals is already resulting in financial, administrative and competitive burdens for air carriers that must obtain aviation fuel from unlisted terminals.

It is clear that Congress intended its list to be only an "initial" list. All major airports should be provided an opportunity to qualify for the list so that only minimal disruption will result and market-place imbalances will not occur. Temporary recognition should be granted upon a representation and preliminary findings that:

 

1) the fuel terminal is located in a secured facility on the airport grounds,

2) the fuel terminal must be secured in terms of restricted and recorded access, and,

3) the refueler truck/tanker vehicles meet the requirements of section 4081(a)(3)(b).

 

Temporary recognition should be sufficient in duration to permit a full review and site inspections by the Service once it establishes a full list of criteria. Because of the significance and impact on operations, a "cure" period should be provided prior to removing a terminal from the list so that terminal operators and owners have an opportunity to modify and correct inadequate operations.

FedEx's fuel terminal, MEM-T-62-TN-2220, is not included in the list of terminals that are treated as located "within a secured area of an airport" under § 4(d)(2)(ii) of Notice 2005-4. However, MEM Terminal T-62-TN-2212 is included in the list, even though the two terminals are similar in all pertinent respects. We believe that the omission of MEM Terminal T-62-TN-2220 was the result of an oversight, which should be rectified. MEM T-62-TN-2220, a facility similar to MEM T-62-TN-2212, is (1) secured by a physical barrier (fencing), (2) entered only through a manned security gate checkpoint, and (3) operated by security-approved personnel. In addition, when not delivered by hydrant, aviation fuel is transported from MEM-T-62-TN-2220 to the wing of an aircraft only by refueler trucks that are not licensed for highway use. Furthermore, no fuel is loaded into highway-licensed vehicles at MEM-T-62-TN-2220. All fuel is loaded into and consumed in FedEx aircraft. Finally, Fedex provides a monthly accounting to the IRS for all purchases and disbursements coming into and leaving its Memphis terminal. By providing the foregoing safeguards and using only non-highway licensed vehicles to transport aviation fuel from the terminal to Fedex aircraft, MEM T-62-TN-2220 should qualify as a terminal located "within a secured area of an airport."

 

Proposed Criteria to Determine Location "Within a Secured Area of an Airport"

 

With respect to the permanent criteria to determine if a fuel facility is "within a secured area of an airport" under section 4081(a)(3)(A)(i), we believe such a list must take into account the various physical and administrative safeguards at each location to ensure that the appropriate amount of fuel excise tax is collected on the removal of aviation-grade kerosene from a terminal. The criteria should be established by first looking at all the locations listed as facilities within a secured area of an airport and determining the similarities of those facilities. Such criteria should include a balancing of the following factors:

 

1. Whether the fuel terminal itself is located in a secure facility on the airport grounds;

2. Whether the fuel terminal is secured in terms of physical access, including a physical barrier or fence;

3. The extent to which refueler truck/tanker operations must meet the other requirements of section 4081(a)(3)(B);

4. The extent to which the fuel terminal operators observe all required recordkeeping and reporting requirements imposed under section 4081(a)(3)(C);

5. Whether signs are posted at secured area access points and various points along the perimeter of the facility that warn against unauthorized entry;

6. The amount (in terms of gallons and number of occurrences) of fuel that is removed from the facility by a highway-licensed truck;

7. Whether fuel is sold or changes ownership from the time it leaves the facility to the time it is placed into the wing;

8. The extent and nature of any public roads dividing the terminal facility from the aircraft refueling areas;

9. The extent to which there have been past irregularities in accounting for gallons leaving the terminal;

10. The number of users at the terminal; and

11. Whether a truck rack at the facility is physically locked and the nature and controls that are in place to access the truck rack.

 

The final list of criteria also should provide recognition that, due to physical constraints at some older airports, "airport property" might necessarily have some unavoidable separations by access roads, highways, etc. That recognition would be consistent with the legislative history, which provides an example of a terminal separated from an airport's runways by an access road. The terminal is physically located on airport grounds and is part of a secure facility. The legislative history states it is intended, in such a case, that the terminal is located within the airport. See Conference Report at 690.

 

The definition of the term "exigent circumstances" should recognize physical conditions at older airports.

 

It is also important to define the term "exigent circumstances" as used in section 4081(a)(3)(A)(iv) as soon as possible.

In defining the term "exigent circumstances," the guidance should recognize the physical conditions that may exist at some older airports. We note that the Conference Report at 690 provides as an example of an "exigent circumstance" a fuel terminal that requires repair or modification so that fuel must be unloaded from the bulk storage tanks into highway vehicles to permit the repairs or modifications to be made. "Exigent circumstances" should also include other temporary but routine and non-routine disruptions, as well as an advance ruling program to determine when a situation will be recognized as an "exigent circumstance."

 

The special exception from tax provided under Treas. Reg. § 48.4081-3(b)(2)(v) should be extended to Aviation-Grade Kerosene

 

Under Treas. Reg. § 48.4081-3(b)(2)(v), diesel fuel removed by a trailer or semi-trailer from a refinery not served by a pipeline, which is transported to a facility less than 20 miles away, is not subject to the tax imposed on removal from a refinery rack. We request that the exception provided by Treas. Reg. § 48.4081-3(b)(2)(v) be amended to also apply to aviation-grade kerosene when the other requirements of Treas. Reg. § 48.4081-3(b)(2) are met. Such an amendment would permit aviation grade kerosene that otherwise meets the requirements of the regulation from being taxed a second time at the full statutory rate.

 

* * *

 

 

FedEx respectfully requests consideration of the above comments. We believe that the suggestions outlined above would achieve the policy objectives of the legislation, and comply with the specific requirements of the legislation, while doing so in a manner that provides the efficient and effective use of compliance resources. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned if you have any questions.
Respectfully submitted,

 

 

FEDEX CORPORATION

 

 

ANDREW P. WAGNER

 

Staff Director-Legal

 

942 S. Shady Grove Road

 

Memphis, TN 38120

 

Phone: (901) 818-7410

 

Fax: (901) 818-7410

 

 

D. MARK CONNELL

 

Manager - Federal Excise & Fuel

 

Tax

 

FEDEX SERVICES

 

3630 Hacks Cross Road

 

Memphis, TN 38125

 

Phone: (901) 434-7290

 

Fax: (901) 434-6890

 

bcc:

 

Joe Schiffhouer

 

Tammy Davis

 

Carol P. Tello

 

 

Frank K. Boland, Esq.

 

Chief, Branch 8

 

Passthroughs & Special Industries

 

 

Deborah Karet, Esq.

 

Attorney-Advisor

 

Branch 8

 

Passthroughs & Special Industries
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Authors
    Wagner, Andrew P.
    Connell, D. Mark
  • Institutional Authors
    FedEx Corporation
  • Cross-Reference
    For Notice 2005-4, 2005-2 IRB 289, see Doc 2004-23794 [PDF]or

    2004 TNT 242-6 2004 TNT 242-6: Internal Revenue Bulletin.
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2005-4881
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2005 TNT 47-29
Copy RID