Menu
Tax Notes logo

Carson Dismayed About Changes in Nonconventional Fuel Credit Availability

NOV. 2, 2000

Carson Dismayed About Changes in Nonconventional Fuel Credit Availability

DATED NOV. 2, 2000
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Authors
    Carson, Julia
  • Institutional Authors
    United States House of Representatives
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    fuel, nonconventional, credit
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2000-29347 (2 original pages)
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2000 TNT 222-14

 

=============== SUMMARY ===============

 

Rep. Julia Carson, D-Ind., has expressed concern over a possible change in the availability of the nonconventional fuel credit under section 29. Changing the credit program, Carson says, will "impede efforts" in the United States to utilize domestic energy reserves, and place an "undue hardship" on companies that have invested toward that end. Instead of changing the program, she says, the Service should address perceived credit abuses through audits of potential abusers and enforcement of the existing section 29 guidelines.

 

=============== FULL TEXT ===============

 

November 2, 2000

 

 

The Honorable Lawrence Summers

 

Secretary of the Treasury

 

Department of the Treasury

 

Room 3330MT

 

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

 

Washington, D.C. 20515

 

 

Dear Secretary Summers:

[1] I am writing to convey my concern about a possible change in the Section 29 tax credit program for synthetic fuel from coal. This proposed change would greatly impact a utility in my district, Citizens Gas and Coke (Citizens) of Indianapolis, Indiana.

[2] Citizens is a significant contributor to the State of Indiana's economy and job market. The company provides energy service to 258,000 customers and employs nearly 1,000 Hoosiers within my congressional district.

[3] Since the extension of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) program in 1996, and relying on certain IRS rulings, companies, such as Citizens, have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in their plants. These plants have served to accomplish the original intent of the program, which is to aid in making the U.S. more energy independent. Other benefits of producing synthetic fuel include better handling characteristics, reduction of dust and coal fines generation, and improved yields of finished product where synthetic fuel is used as a raw material in production applications.

[4] If it is believed that there are abuses to the Section 29 program, the IRS should audit those potential abusers and enforce the existing guidelines that have been developed over time.

[5] To discontinue this important program now will impede efforts in the United States to fully utilize our own energy reserves and place an undue hardship on companies that have invested toward that end.

[6] I appreciate your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

 

 

Julia Carson

 

Member of Congress

 

House of Representatives

 

Washington, D.C.
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Authors
    Carson, Julia
  • Institutional Authors
    United States House of Representatives
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    fuel, nonconventional, credit
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2000-29347 (2 original pages)
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2000 TNT 222-14
Copy RID