Menu
Tax Notes logo

COURT DISMISSES SUIT SEEKING REFUND FOR RESPONSIBLE PERSON PENALTY.

APR. 20, 2000

Shumate, Joseph B., Jr. v. U.S.

DATED APR. 20, 2000
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    JOSEPH B. SHUMATE, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.
  • Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • Docket
    No. 00-1153
  • Judge
    per curiam
  • Cross-Reference
    Joseph B. Shumate Jr. v. United States, No. 94-448-R (May 20, 1999)

    (For a summary, see Tax Notes, July 5, 1999, p. 78; for the full

    text, see Doc 1999-20362 (6 original pages) or 1999 TNT 124-12.)
  • Parallel Citation
    213 F.3d 632
    2000-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50,400
    86 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2000-5992
    2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7165
    2000 WL 431642
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    payment, failure of, responsible person
    refunds, taxpayer suits
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2000-23643 (1 original page)
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2000 TNT 178-7

Shumate, Joseph B., Jr. v. U.S.

                         NOT FOR PUBLICATION

 

 

                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS,

 

                            4TH CIRCUIT

 

 

                           April 20, 2000

 

 

  Affirming a District Court decision, 99-1 USTC paragraph 60,601.

 

 

     Joseph B. Shumate, Jr., pro se. David I. Pincus, Joel L.

 

McElvain, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, for

 

defendant-appellee.

 

 

     Before: Widener and Wilkins, Circuit Judges, and Hamilton,

 

Senior Circuit Judge.

 

 

OPINION

[1] PER CURIAM: Joseph B. Shumate, Jr., appeals the district court's orders awarding judgment to the United States on his tax refund suit. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Shumate v. United States, No. CA-94-448-7 (W.D. Va. May 20 [99-1 USTC paragraph 50,601], Oct. 25, & Dec. 10, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

[2] AFFIRMED

DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    JOSEPH B. SHUMATE, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.
  • Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • Docket
    No. 00-1153
  • Judge
    per curiam
  • Cross-Reference
    Joseph B. Shumate Jr. v. United States, No. 94-448-R (May 20, 1999)

    (For a summary, see Tax Notes, July 5, 1999, p. 78; for the full

    text, see Doc 1999-20362 (6 original pages) or 1999 TNT 124-12.)
  • Parallel Citation
    213 F.3d 632
    2000-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50,400
    86 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2000-5992
    2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7165
    2000 WL 431642
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    payment, failure of, responsible person
    refunds, taxpayer suits
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2000-23643 (1 original page)
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2000 TNT 178-7
Copy RID