Menu
Tax Notes logo

IRS WINS SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR UNPAID TAXES.

FEB. 29, 2000

Whitehead, Jean A., et al., U.S. v.

DATED FEB. 29, 2000
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEAN A. WHITEHEAD, CULBREATH WHITEHEAD, JR., Defendants-Appellants, LEONARD E. LARSON, C. LEE BOATWRIGHT, WALTER B. FITT, ET AL., Defendants.
  • Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
  • Docket
    No. 98-3541
  • Judge
    per curiam
  • Cross-Reference
    United States v. Whitehead, No. 97-2903-CIV-T-26E (M.D. Fla. Sept. 28,

    1998) (For a summary, see Tax Notes, Nov. 2, 1998, p. 589; for the

    full text, see Doc 98-31039 (4 pages) or 98 TNT 207-12.)
  • Parallel Citation
    211 F.3d 128
    85 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2000-1133
    2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11230
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    liens, enforcement
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2000-7601 (3 original pages)
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2000 TNT 51-15

Whitehead, Jean A., et al., U.S. v.

                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]

 

 

                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 

                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

 

            APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

                 FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 

 

                        Non-Argument Calendar

 

 

                  D.C. Docket No. 97-02903-CV-T-26E

 

 

                         (February 29, 2000)

 

 

     Before Edmondson, Black and Marcus, Circuit Judges.

 

 

PER CURIAM:

[1] Jean Whitehead appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the government on its actions against Whitehead for its assessments against her and its foreclosure of tax liens on Whitehead's property. Whitehead's claim that she cannot be liable for federal income taxes is meritless. With the exception of the assessments of the civil fraud penalties, the district court, by relying on the government's certificates of assessment, properly found that the government was entitled to judgment in the amounts assessed against Whitehead and to foreclose the federal tax liens on Whitehead's property. The district court erred in finding Whitehead liable for the civil fraud penalties without requiring the government to present clear and convincing evidence on the fraud, and thus the case must be remanded for that limited purpose. The district court did not err in finding that a jury trial was unnecessary and granting summary judgment on the assessed taxes, interest, and non-fraud penalties. But on remand, the district court can redetermine whether a genuine issue exists on the question of fraud and whether a jury is necessary for that issue. Whitehead's claims that the Internal Revenue Service did not have jurisdiction over her is meritless.

[2] AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.

DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEAN A. WHITEHEAD, CULBREATH WHITEHEAD, JR., Defendants-Appellants, LEONARD E. LARSON, C. LEE BOATWRIGHT, WALTER B. FITT, ET AL., Defendants.
  • Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
  • Docket
    No. 98-3541
  • Judge
    per curiam
  • Cross-Reference
    United States v. Whitehead, No. 97-2903-CIV-T-26E (M.D. Fla. Sept. 28,

    1998) (For a summary, see Tax Notes, Nov. 2, 1998, p. 589; for the

    full text, see Doc 98-31039 (4 pages) or 98 TNT 207-12.)
  • Parallel Citation
    211 F.3d 128
    85 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2000-1133
    2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11230
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    liens, enforcement
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2000-7601 (3 original pages)
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2000 TNT 51-15
Copy RID