Menu
Tax Notes logo

PROPERTY TRANSFER VOIDED, LIENS ENFORCED.

OCT. 6, 2000

Larson, Irving L., et al., U.S. v.

DATED OCT. 6, 2000
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IRVING L. LARSON, ET AL.
  • Court
    United States District Court for the District of Maryland
  • Docket
    No. S 92-40
  • Judge
    Smalkin, Frederic N.
  • Parallel Citation
    86 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2000-6829
    2000 WL 1753174
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    liens, enforcement
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2000-29078 (4 original pages)
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2000 TNT 220-18

Larson, Irving L., et al., U.S. v.

                 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

                    FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

 

 

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

 

[1] This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, which requests various forms of relief based upon the income tax liability assessed against Irving L. Larson for various years between 1976 and 1981. The balances due on these assessments as of November 30, 1989, was $63,129.83. Tax liens were filed against Mr. Larson in the spring of 1986. In 1980 and 1986, there were certain deeds of record affecting property in Wicomico County owned by the Larsons, both made for little or no consideration. The first, in 1980, was a deed that conveyed the property from Irving L. Larson and Leah M. Larson, as tenants by the entireties, to them as tenants in common, predating the filing of the tax lien. After the lien was filed, a purported "confirmatory deed" was executed, conveying the property from Irving L. Larson and Leah M. Larson to Leah M. Larson, individually.

[2] The Government claims by its present submission and its exhibits that it has established a prima facie case, and the burden of proving the assessments erroneous is upon the defendants. The Government is correct. Now, of course, the defendants must come fact- finder in finding in their favor, were the case at the directed verdict stage, by the appropriate proof burden. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty, Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986). Defendants were properly notified by letter from the Clerk of Court of their obligation to, and how to, make a timely opposition to the plaintiff's motion and of the consequences of their failure to do so. The time for opposing the motion under the Local Rules of this Court has run, and no opposition has been received.

[3] Because the Government has demonstrated, in accordance with Celotex, supra, its clear entitlement to judgment in its favor as a matter of law, and the defendants have not brought forward any evidence to generate a triable dispute, the Government's motion will be granted, and judgment entered in its favor, as prayed, by a separate Order to be filed herein.

 Dated: October 6, 2000             Frederic N. Smalkin

 

                                    United States District Judge

 

 

                               * * * * *

 

 

                          ORDER AND JUDGMENT

 

 

[4] For the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion of even date filed herewith, it is this 6th day of October, 2000, by the Court, ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

1. That the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment BE, and it hereby IS, GRANTED;

2. That judgment BE, and the same hereby IS, entered in favor of the United States of America against Irving L. Larson in the amount of $63,129.83, with interest and penalties provided by law from November 30, 1989, until the date hereof, and with interest and penalties as provided by law from the date hereof until paid;

3. That the United States of America has valid federal tax liens effective as of the dates of the assessments (July 8, and July 15, 1985) on all property and rights in property of Irving L. Larson, including his interest as tenant in common in the property described in a certain deed and confirmatory deed executed May 13, 1980, and October 16, 1986, and recorded among the Land Records of Wicomico Country at Li. 942, P. 499 and Li. 2084, P. 733, respectively;

4. That the post-lien confirmatory deed of October 16, 1986, recorded at Li. 1084, P. 733 BE, and the same hereby IS, DECLARED to be NULL and VOID, insofar as it purports to convey Irving L. Larson's interest as tenant in common of the property described therein to Leah M. Larson, free of tax liens or other encumbrances;

5. That the property described in the aforementioned deeds is subject to any and all liens of the Internal Revenue Service against Irving L. Larson;

6. That the federal tax liens aforementioned BE, and they hereby ARE, ordered enforced and foreclosed, and that the property described in the aforementioned deeds be sold according to law by the appropriate officer, free and clear of any right, title, or lien belonging to, or in favor of, Irving L. Larson and/or Leah M. Larson;

7. That one-half of the proceeds of the sale of said real property, net of one-half of the expenses of sale, BE remitted to Leah M. Larson, with the remainder to the United States, in satisfaction of all, or part of, the tax liability of Irving L. Larson, in connection with the tax liens on the said property; and

8. That the Clerk of Court mail copies hereof and of the foregoing Memorandum Opinion to counsel for the Government and to the pro se defendants.

                                   Frederic N. Smalkin

 

                                   United States District Judge
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IRVING L. LARSON, ET AL.
  • Court
    United States District Court for the District of Maryland
  • Docket
    No. S 92-40
  • Judge
    Smalkin, Frederic N.
  • Parallel Citation
    86 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2000-6829
    2000 WL 1753174
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    liens, enforcement
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2000-29078 (4 original pages)
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2000 TNT 220-18
Copy RID