Writer Criticizes Proposed Shipping and Aircraft Regs
Writer Criticizes Proposed Shipping and Aircraft Regs
- AuthorsGutschewski, Bernie
- Institutional AuthorsUnion Pacific
- Cross-Reference
- Code Sections
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Index Termsforeign firms, exclusions
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 2000-29350 (1 original page)
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2000 TNT 222-16
=============== SUMMARY ===============
Bernie Gutschewski of Union Pacific, Omaha, Neb., has urged Treasury to reconsider the proposed regs exempting foreign ship and aircraft operators from U.S. income tax to insure that they don't contradict the intent of section 883. (For a summary of REG-208280-86, see Tax Notes, Feb. 14, 2000, p. 931; for the full text, see Doc 2000- 4241 (26 original pages), 2000 TNT 31-19 , or H&D, Feb. 8, 2000, p. 2100.) The proposed regs, Gutschewski says, could have a "disruptive impact" on the "efficient intermodal transportation system" that has developed in the United States by imposing U.S. income tax on operations that were previously considered exempt. Also, he adds, the regs impose "new regulatory burdens" that will have a "negative impact" on the system.
=============== FULL TEXT ===============
November 1, 2000
The Honorable Lawrence H. Summers
Secretary of the Treasury
U.S. Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20220
Re: Proposed Treasury regulations under Internal Revenue Code
section 883
Dear Mr. Summers:
[1] In February, the Department of the Treasury released proposed regulations under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 883 dealing with U.S. income taxation of the international operation of ships, aircraft, and railroad rolling stock. 1 These proposed regulations were the subject of a public hearing on June 8, 2000. At the hearing and in written comments, many affected shippers criticized the proposed regulations as a significant narrowing of the tax exemption provided by section 883. 2
[2] These proposed regulations do not specifically apply to Union Pacific. Nevertheless, Union Pacific is very concerned about the potential disruptive impact the proposed regulations could have on the efficient intermodal transportation system that has developed in the U.S. Many of our international customers are concerned that the proposed regulations impose U.S. income taxes on operations previously considered exempt, and also impose new regulatory burdens that will have a negative impact on this system.
[3] In light of the controversy that has arisen, Union Pacific respectfully asks that the Department of the Treasury reconsider the proposed regulations to make certain that they do not contradict the intent of IRC section 883 and do not create unnecessary burdens on international commerce.
Sincerely,
Bernie Gutschewski
Vice President - Taxes
Union Pacific
Omaha, Nebraska
1 65 Federal Register 6065 (February 8, 2000)
2 Union Pacific did not submit comments on the proposed regulations.
END OF FOOTNOTES
- AuthorsGutschewski, Bernie
- Institutional AuthorsUnion Pacific
- Cross-Reference
- Code Sections
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Index Termsforeign firms, exclusions
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 2000-29350 (1 original page)
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2000 TNT 222-16