Menu
Tax Notes logo

Dodgers Owner Petitions Tax Court to Review FPAA

JAN. 15, 2014

The McCourt Broderick LP et al. v. Commissioner

DATED JAN. 15, 2014
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    THE MCCOURT BRODERICK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (NOW KNOWN AS MCCOURT BRODERICK LLC) THE MCCOURT COMPANY, INC., TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
  • Court
    United States Tax Court
  • Docket
    No. 919-14
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2014-4211
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2014 TNT 38-23

The McCourt Broderick LP et al. v. Commissioner

[Editor's Note: For the full petition, including exhibits .]

 

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

 

 

PETITION FOR READJUSTMENT OF PARTNERSHIP ITEMS UNDER CODE

 

SECTION 6226

 

 

Petitioner hereby petitions for readjustment of partnership items under Internal Revenue Code section 6226 as set forth by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the Commissioner's notice of final partnership administrative adjustment dated November 4, 2013. In support thereof, petitioner alleges as follows:

1. Petitioner, The McCourt Company, Inc., is a corporation with a legal residence in Delaware.

2. At the time of the filing of the petition, The McCourt Broderick Limited Partnership (now known as McCourt Broderick LLC) ("TMBLP") had a principal place of business of 888 7th Avenue, Floor 43, New York, New York 10106.

3. Petitioner is the tax matters partner of TMBLP.

4. TMBLP's United States Return of Partnership Income (Form 1065) for taxable year 2008 was filed with the office of the Internal Revenue Service located at Ogden, Utah.

5. The notice of final partnership administrative adjustment ("FPAA") was mailed to petitioner on November 4, 2013 and was issued by the office of the Internal Revenue Service located at 15 New Sudbury Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02203-0208. A complete copy of the FPAA, as redacted pursuant to Rule 27 of the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, is attached as Exhibit A.

6. The partnership adjustments as set forth in the FPAA, all of which are in dispute, relate to taxable year 2008 and total $60,138,543.

7. The partnership adjustments as set forth in the FPAA are based on the following errors:

a. Respondent erred when he disallowed TMBLP's repairs and maintenance expense deduction in the amount of $5,168,074.

b. Respondent erred when he disallowed TMBLP's interest expense deduction in the amount of $32,258,923.

c. Respondent erred when he disallowed TMBLP's amortization expense deduction related to media rights in the amount of $1,901,209.

d. Respondent erred when he disallowed TMBLP's amortization expense deduction related to non-player contracts in the amount of $76,145.

e. Respondent erred when he disallowed TMBLP's amortization expense deduction related to Los Angeles Dodgers ("Dodgers") player contracts in the amount of $210,697.

f. Respondent erred when he disallowed TMBLP's meals and entertainment expense deduction in the amount of $1,229,753.

g. Respondent erred when he disallowed TMBLP's travel expense deduction in the amount of $6,325,677.

h. Respondent erred when he disallowed TMBLP's insurance expense deduction in the amount of $5,523,848.

i. Respondent erred when he disallowed TMBLP's promotion expense deduction in the amount of $1,995,177.

j. Respondent erred when he disallowed TMBLP's other deductions related to baseball operations in the amount of $1,769,036.

k. Respondent erred when he disallowed TMBLP's employee benefit program expense deduction in the amount of $4,062,892.

8. The facts upon which petitioner relies in support of its petition are as follows:

a. During 2008, TMBLP's primary business activity was the ownership and operation, through various wholly-owned subsidiaries, of the Dodgers Major League Baseball franchise.

b. Also during 2008, TMBLP engaged in other business activities through various wholly-owned subsidiaries, including the ownership and operation of the Los Angeles Marathon ("Marathon").

c. TMBLP is able to substantiate the deductions disallowed by respondent in the FPAA.

d. The expense deductions claimed on TMBLP's 2008 partnership return were ordinary and necessary to TMBLP's trade or business.

e. During 2008, TMBLP paid or incurred $5,168,074 in repairs and maintenance expenses related to Dodger Stadium.

f. TMBLP's repair and maintenance expenses related to Dodger Stadium in 2008 were properly classified as such and were not permanent improvements or betterments.

g. During 2008, TMBLP properly claimed a deduction for interest on indebtedness related to its business operations in the amount of $32,258,923.

h. During 2008, TMBLP incurred an amortization expense deduction in the amount of $33,844,137.

i. On its 2008 partnership return, TMBLP properly claimed an amortization deduction related to Dodgers player contracts, non-player contracts related to Dodgers operations, and Dodgers media rights, as all such intangibles were used in the course of TMBLP's business for only a limited period, the length of which was estimated with reasonable accuracy.

j. During 2008, TMBLP properly claimed $1,339,897 in ordinary and necessary meals and entertainment expense deductions, after the application of the 50% limit found in I.R.C. § 274(n).

k. During 2008, TMBLP properly claimed $12,785,105 in ordinary and necessary travel expense deductions from the operation of the Dodgers.

l. During 2008, TMBLP properly claimed $5,661,883 in ordinary and necessary insurance expense deductions from the operation of the Dodgers.

m. During 2008, TMBLP properly claimed $6,997,171 in ordinary and necessary promotion expense deductions from the operation of the Dodgers.

n. During 2008, TMBLP properly claimed $1,769,036 in ordinary and necessary other business expense deductions related to the operation of the Dodgers.

o. During 2008, TMBLP properly claimed $4,062,892 in ordinary and necessary employee benefit program expense deductions.

WHEREFORE, petitioner prays that the court (i) readjust the partnership items as set forth above and (ii) grant such other further relief to which TMBLP is entitled.

Date: January 14, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

 

 

David J. Nagle

 

Counsel for the Petitioner

 

Tax Court Bar No. ND0156

 

Sullivan & Worcester LLP

 

One Post Office Square

 

Boston, Massachusetts 02109-2129

 

(617) 338-2800

 

(617) 338-2880 (fax)

 

Date: January 14, 2014
Daniel P. Ryan

 

Counsel for the Petitioner

 

Tax Court Bar No. RD0510

 

Sullivan & Worcester LLP

 

One Post Office Square

 

Boston, Massachusetts 02109-2129

 

(617) 338-2800

 

(617) 338-2880 (fax)

 

Date: January 13, 2014
Kevin F. Long

 

Counsel for the Petitioner

 

Tax Court Bar No. LK0104

 

Long & Bott, P.C.

 

PO Box 815

 

Sudbury, Massachusetts 01776

 

(978) 443-1655

 

(617) 686-9090 (fax)
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    THE MCCOURT BRODERICK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (NOW KNOWN AS MCCOURT BRODERICK LLC) THE MCCOURT COMPANY, INC., TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
  • Court
    United States Tax Court
  • Docket
    No. 919-14
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2014-4211
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2014 TNT 38-23
Copy RID