Menu
Tax Notes logo

IRS, Treasury to Consider Lawmakers' Comments on Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Credit

OCT. 3, 2011

INFO 2011-0083

DATED OCT. 3, 2011
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Institutional Authors
    Internal Revenue Service
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2012-3272
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2012 TNT 33-24
Citations: INFO 2011-0083

UIL: 45Q.00-00

 

Release Date: 12/30/2011

 

Date: October 3, 2011

 

 

Refer Reply To: CC:PSI:B06 - CONEX-136687-11

 

 

The Honorable Dan Boren

 

United States House of Representatives

 

Washington, DC 20515

 

 

Dear Mr. Boren:

Thank you for the letter dated August 25, 2011, from you and Representative James Lankford to Commissioner Shulman, on the application of the carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration credit under section 45Q of the Internal Revenue Code. Specifically, you asked for clarification of the term "qualified facility."

Generally, under section 45Q, a taxpayer can claim a credit of $20 per metric ton of qualified CO2 that the taxpayer captures at a qualified facility, disposes of in secure geological storage, and does not use as a tertiary injectant. The credit is $10 per metric ton if a taxpayer uses the qualified CO2 as a tertiary injectant in a qualified enhanced oil or natural gas recovery project. The term "qualified facility" refers to an industrial facility that the taxpayer owns and, at which, the taxpayer places the carbon capture equipment in service and captures at least 500,000 metric tons of CO2 during the taxable year. Only CO2 captured at an industrial facility qualifies for the credit.

On November 2, 2009, we issued Notice 2009-83 (see enclosed), which provides guidance to determine eligibility for the credit, including a definition of "industrial facility." Under this guidance, an industrial facility is a facility that meets the following two conditions. The facility:

 

1. Produces a CO2 stream from a fuel combustion source, a manufacturing process, or a fugitive CO2 emission source

2. Does not produce CO2 from CO2 production wells at natural CO2-bearing formations

 

You stated in your letter that the congressional intent of section 45Q was not to exclude CO2 captured from a high content natural gas stream, but rather to exclude CO2 that a taxpayer extracts from the earth for its standalone value. Therefore, in the application of section 45Q, the guidance should not exclude natural gas and oil wells that the taxpayer drills solely for the purpose of extracting natural gas and oil merely because the produced hydrocarbons are found in "natural CO2 bearing formations."

We appreciate receiving your views in this matter. We understand the need for clarity in the application of section 45Q for a facility that processes natural gas produced from natural gas formations. We have shared your letter with the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy of the Department of Treasury. We are working with officials at that office to give your views thorough and careful consideration in ensuring the appropriate interpretation of section 45Q.

I am sending a similar letter to your colleague. I hope this information is helpful. If you need further assistance on this matter, please contact * * * at * * *.

Sincerely,

 

 

Curt Wilson

 

Associate Chief Counsel

 

(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

 

Enclosure

 

* * * * *

 

 

UIL: 45Q.00-00

 

Release Date: 12/30/2011

 

Date: October 3, 2011

 

 

Refer Reply To: CC:PSI:B06 - CONEX-136687-11

 

 

The Honorable James Lankford

 

United States House of Representatives

 

Washington, DC 20515

 

 

Dear Mr. Lankford:

Thank you for the letter dated August 25, 2011, from you and Representative Dan Boren to Commissioner Shulman, on the application of the carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration credit under section 45Q of the Internal Revenue Code. Specifically, you asked for clarification of the term "qualified facility."

Generally, under section 45Q, a taxpayer can claim a credit of $20 per metric ton of qualified CO2 that the taxpayer captures at a qualified facility, disposes of in secure geological storage, and does not use as a tertiary injectant. The credit is $10 per metric ton if a taxpayer uses the qualified CO2 as a tertiary injectant in a qualified enhanced oil or natural gas recovery project. The term "qualified facility" refers to an industrial facility that the taxpayer owns and, at which, the taxpayer places the carbon capture equipment in service and captures at least 500,000 metric tons of CO2 during the taxable year. Only CO2 captured at an industrial facility qualifies for the credit.

On November 2, 2009, we issued Notice 2009-83 (see enclosed), which provides guidance to determine eligibility for the credit, including a definition of "industrial facility." Under this guidance, an industrial facility is a facility that meets the following two conditions. The facility:

 

1. Produces a CO2 stream from a fuel combustion source, a manufacturing process, or a fugitive CO2 emission source

2. Does not produce CO2 from CO2 production wells at natural CO2-bearing formations

 

You stated in your letter that the congressional intent of section 45Q was not to exclude CO2 captured from a high content natural gas stream, but rather to exclude CO2 that a taxpayer extracts from the earth for its standalone value. Therefore, in the application of section 45Q, the guidance should not exclude natural gas and oil wells that the taxpayer drills solely for the purpose of extracting natural gas and oil merely because the produced hydrocarbons are found in "natural CO2 bearing formations."

We appreciate receiving your views in this matter. We understand the need for clarity in the application of section 45Q for a facility that processes natural gas produced from natural gas formations. We have shared your letter with the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy of the Department of Treasury. We are working with officials at that office to give your views thorough and careful consideration in ensuring the appropriate interpretation of section 45Q.

I am sending a similar letter to your colleague. I hope this information is helpful. If you need further assistance on this matter, please contact * * * at * * *.

Sincerely,

 

 

Curt Wilson

 

Associate Chief Counsel

 

(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

 

Enclosure
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Institutional Authors
    Internal Revenue Service
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2012-3272
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2012 TNT 33-24
Copy RID