Menu
Tax Notes logo

Ninth Circuit Denies Rehearing in Mailbox Rule Case

JUN. 25, 2019

Baldwin, Howard L. et ux. v. United States

DATED JUN. 25, 2019
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    Howard L. Baldwin et ux. v. United States
  • Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • Docket
    No. 17-55115
    No. 17-55354
  • Judge
    Per Curiam
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    2019-24786
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2019 TNTF 123-49
    2019 TPR 26-16

Baldwin, Howard L. et ux. v. United States

HOWARD L. BALDWIN; KAREN BALDWIN,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-06004-RGK-AGR

Central District of California, Los Angeles

ORDER

Before: GRABER and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and ZOUHARY,* District Judge.

The panel unanimously votes to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Graber and Watford vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Zouhary so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, filed May 29, 2019, is DENIED.

FOOTNOTES

*The Honorable Jack Zouhary, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

END FOOTNOTES

DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    Howard L. Baldwin et ux. v. United States
  • Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • Docket
    No. 17-55115
    No. 17-55354
  • Judge
    Per Curiam
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    2019-24786
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2019 TNTF 123-49
    2019 TPR 26-16
Copy RID