Ninth Circuit Denies Rehearing in Mailbox Rule Case
Baldwin, Howard L. et ux. v. United States
- Case NameHoward L. Baldwin et ux. v. United States
- CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- DocketNo. 17-55115No. 17-55354
- JudgePer Curiam
- Code Sections
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Jurisdictions
- Tax Analysts Document Number2019-24786
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2019 TNTF 123-492019 TPR 26-16
Baldwin, Howard L. et ux. v. United States
HOWARD L. BALDWIN; KAREN BALDWIN,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
D.C. No. 2:15-cv-06004-RGK-AGR
Central District of California, Los Angeles
ORDER
Before: GRABER and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and ZOUHARY,* District Judge.
The panel unanimously votes to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Graber and Watford vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Zouhary so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, filed May 29, 2019, is DENIED.
FOOTNOTES
*The Honorable Jack Zouhary, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
END FOOTNOTES
- Case NameHoward L. Baldwin et ux. v. United States
- CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- DocketNo. 17-55115No. 17-55354
- JudgePer Curiam
- Code Sections
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Jurisdictions
- Tax Analysts Document Number2019-24786
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2019 TNTF 123-492019 TPR 26-16