<div>8/29/2017Operator of Online Tax Preparation Service Agrees to Settle FTC Charges That it Violated Financial Privacy and Security Rules | Federal Trade …              Operator of Online Tax Preparation Service Agrees to Settle FTC Charges That it Violated Financial Privacy and Security Rules   <table><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td colspan="9">Share This Page</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td colspan="9">FOR RELEASE</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="10">August 29, 2017</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="8">TAGS: <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/bureaus/bureau-consumer-protection">Bureau of Consumer Protection</a></td><td> </td><td> </td><td colspan="5"><a href="https://www.ftc.gov/mission/consumer-protection">Consumer Protection</a></td><td> </td><td colspan="3"><a href="https://www.ftc.gov/consumer-protection/privacy-and-security">Privacy and Security</a></td><td> </td><td colspan="2"><a href="https://www.ftc.gov/consumer-protection/consumer-privacy">Consumer Privacy</a></td><td> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td colspan="5"> </td><td> </td><td colspan="3"> </td><td> </td><td colspan="2"> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td colspan="3"><a href="https://www.ftc.gov/consumer-protection/data-security">Data Security</a></td><td> </td><td> </td><td colspan="4"><a href="https://www.ftc.gov/consumer-protection/gramm-leach-bliley-act">Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act</a></td><td> </td><td> </td><td colspan="10"><a href="https://www.ftc.gov/scams/identity-theft">Identity Theft</a></td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td colspan="3"> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td colspan="4"> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td colspan="10"> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr></table>  The operator of a Georgia-based online tax preparation service has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission allegations that it violated federal rules on financial privacy and security. In its <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/1623063_taxslayer_complaint.pdf">complaint </a>against TaxSlayer, LLC, the FTC alleged that malicious hackers were able to gain full access to nearly 9,000 TaxSlayer accounts between October 2015 and December 2015. The hackers used the information they accessed to engage in tax identity theft, which allowed them to obtain tax refunds by filing fraudulent tax returns, according to the complaint. The FTC charged that TaxSlayer violated the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act’s <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/rules/rulemaking-regulatory-reform-proceedings/safeguards-rule">Safeguards Rule</a>, which requires financial institutions to implement safeguards to protect the security, confidentiality and integrity of customer information, and the <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/rules/rulemaking-regulatory-reform-proceedings/financial-privacy-rule">Privacy Rule</a>, which requires financial institutions to deliver privacy notices to customers. “Tax preparation services are responsible for very sensitive information, so it’s critical they implement appropriate safeguards to protect that information,” said Tom Pahl, Acting Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “TaxSlayer didn’t have an adequate risk assessment plan, and hackers took over user accounts and committed identity theft.” The FTC alleged that TaxSlayer violated the Safeguards Rule by failing to develop a written comprehensive security program until November 2015; to conduct a risk assessment to identify reasonably foreseeable internal and external risks to security; and to implement information security safeguards that would help prevent a cyberattack. For example, TaxSlayer failed to implement adequate risk-based authentication measures that would have helped reduce the chances of an attack from hackers who had used stolen credentials to try to gain access to TaxSlayer customer accounts, according to the complaint. The FTC also alleged that the company did not require consumers to choose strong passwords, exposing customers to the risk that attackers could guess commonly used passwords to access their TaxSlayer accounts.   https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2017/08/operator-online-tax-preparation-service-agrees-settle-ftc-charges1/2 8/29/2017Operator of Online Tax Preparation Service Agrees to Settle FTC Charges That it Violated Financial Privacy and Security Rules | Federal Trade …  The FTC also alleged that the company violated the Privacy Rule by failing to provide its customers with a clear and conspicuous initial privacy notice and to deliver it in a way that ensured that customers received it. “This case also demonstrates the importance of password protection,” said Pahl. “Hackers took advantage of people who re-used passwords from other sites, and the attack ended when TaxSlayer eventually required people to use multi-factor authentication.” As part of the settlement with the FTC, the company is prohibited from violating the Privacy Rule and the Safeguards Rule of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act for 20 years. Consistent with several past cases involving violations of Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Rules, the company is required for 10 years to obtain biennial third-party assessments of its compliance with these rules. The Commission vote to issue the administrative complaint and to accept the consent agreement was 2-0. The FTC will publish a description of the consent agreement package in the Federal Register shortly. The agreement will be subject to public comment for 30 days, beginning today and continuing through September 29, 2017, after which the Commission will decide whether to make the proposed consent order final. Interested parties can <a href="https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/taxslayerconsent">submit comments electronically </a>by following the instructions in the “Invitation To Comment” part of the “<a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/1623063_taxslayer_analysis.pdf">Supplementary Information</a>” section. NOTE: The Commission issues an administrative complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. When the Commission issues a consent order on a final basis, it carries the force of law with respect to future actions. Each violation of such an order may result in a civil penalty of up to $40,654. <a href="https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/">The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more</a> <a href="https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/">about consumer topics and file a </a><a href="https://www.ftc.gov/complaint">consumer complaint online </a><a href="https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/">or by calling 1-877-FTC-HELP (382-4357). Like the FTC on</a> <a href="https://www.facebook.com/federaltradecommission">Facebook </a>, follow us on <a href="https://twitter.com/FTC">Twitter </a>, read our <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs">blogs </a>and <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/stay-connected">subscribe to press releases </a>for the latest FTC news and resources. Contact Information MEDIA CONTACT: <a href="mailto:jhenderson2@ftc.gov">Juliana Gruenwald Henderson</a>, Office of Public Affairs 202-326-2924 STAFF CONTACTS: Katherine McCarron, Bureau of Consumer Protection 202-326-2333 Jacqueline Connor, Bureau of Consumer Protection 202-326-2844                 https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2017/08/operator-online-tax-preparation-service-agrees-settle-ftc-charges2/2</div>

Operator of TaxSlayer Agrees to Settle Security Charges, FTC Says

Operator of TaxSlayer Agrees to Settle Security Charges, FTC Says

Federal Trade Commission

In an August 29 release, the Federal Trade Commission announced that the operator of TaxSlayer LLC, a Georgia-based online return preparation business, had agreed to settle charges that it broke federal rules regarding financial privacy and security safeguards, after hackers were able to access around 9,000 TaxSlayer accounts during a 2015 data breach.

In an August 29 release, the Federal Trade Commission announced that the operator of TaxSlayer LLC, a Georgia-based online return preparation business, had agreed to settle charges that it broke federal rules regarding financial privacy and security safeguards, after hackers were able to access around 9,000 TaxSlayer accounts during a 2015 data breach.