PENSION PLANNING CO. OPPOSES PROHIBITION ON USE OF ELECTIVE CONTRIBUTIONS TO PROVIDE REQUIRED MINIMUM BENEFITS.
PENSION PLANNING CO. OPPOSES PROHIBITION ON USE OF ELECTIVE CONTRIBUTIONS TO PROVIDE REQUIRED MINIMUM BENEFITS.
- AuthorsLein, Barbara
- Institutional AuthorsPension Planning Co., Inc.
- Code Sections
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Index Termselective contributiontop-heavy planssalary reduction arrangement
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 88-7497
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation88 TNT 184-24
=============== SUMMARY ===============
Barbara Lein of the Pension Planning Co., Inc., New York, N.Y., has opposed proposed regulation section 1.401(k)-1, which prohibits the use of elective contributions and matching contributions to provide the required minimum benefit for nonkey employees in top- heavy plans. Lein says that when TEFRA was adopted, section 416(c)(2)(C) provided that elective contributions under a salary reduction arrangement could not be counted in providing the minimum required benefit for nonkey employees in top-heavy plans. She points out that Congress repealed the rule for post-1984 plan years. She argues that the regulation contravenes existing law and the intent of Congress in repealing section 416(c)(2)(C).
=============== FULL TEXT ===============
August 24, 1988
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1111 Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20224
Attention: CC:LR: T(EE-158-86, 160-86)
Dear Sir:
The recently issued proposed regulation 1.401(k)-1 provides that, for plan years beginning after 1988, elective contributions and matching contributions may not be used to satisfy the requirement of providing a minimum benefit to non-key employees in top-heavy plans.
When TEFRA was adopted, Section 416(c)(2)(C) provided that elective contributions attributable to a salary reduction arrangement could not be taken into account for purposes of providing the minimum required benefit to non-key employees in top-heavy plans. Congress repealed this rule with respect to plan years beginning after 1984.
None of the multiple pieces of legislation enacted or proposed since that date has reinstated this prohibition; yet IRS has nonetheless prohibited not only elective contributions, but matching contributions as well, from being used to satisfy the top-heavy minimum contribution rule.
The proposed regulation directly contravenes existing law, and the intent of Congress in repealing Section 416(c)(2)(C). Unless and until legislation is enacted to prohibit such use, the proposed regulation should be revised to permit both elective and matching contributions to be used to satisfy the top-heavy minimum contribution requirement.
Very truly yours,
Barbara Lein
General Counsel
Pension Planning Company, Inc.
New York, NY
cc: Senator Alfonse D'Amato
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan
Congressman Dan Rostenkowski
Congressman Bill Green
Senator Robert Dole
- AuthorsLein, Barbara
- Institutional AuthorsPension Planning Co., Inc.
- Code Sections
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Index Termselective contributiontop-heavy planssalary reduction arrangement
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 88-7497
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation88 TNT 184-24