Menu
Tax Notes logo

PENSION PLANNING CO. OPPOSES PROHIBITION ON USE OF ELECTIVE CONTRIBUTIONS TO PROVIDE REQUIRED MINIMUM BENEFITS.

AUG. 24, 1988

PENSION PLANNING CO. OPPOSES PROHIBITION ON USE OF ELECTIVE CONTRIBUTIONS TO PROVIDE REQUIRED MINIMUM BENEFITS.

DATED AUG. 24, 1988
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Authors
    Lein, Barbara
  • Institutional Authors
    Pension Planning Co., Inc.
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    elective contribution
    top-heavy plans
    salary reduction arrangement
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 88-7497
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    88 TNT 184-24

 

=============== SUMMARY ===============

 

Barbara Lein of the Pension Planning Co., Inc., New York, N.Y., has opposed proposed regulation section 1.401(k)-1, which prohibits the use of elective contributions and matching contributions to provide the required minimum benefit for nonkey employees in top- heavy plans. Lein says that when TEFRA was adopted, section 416(c)(2)(C) provided that elective contributions under a salary reduction arrangement could not be counted in providing the minimum required benefit for nonkey employees in top-heavy plans. She points out that Congress repealed the rule for post-1984 plan years. She argues that the regulation contravenes existing law and the intent of Congress in repealing section 416(c)(2)(C).

 

=============== FULL TEXT ===============

 

August 24, 1988

 

 

Commissioner of Internal Revenue

 

1111 Constitution Ave., N.W.

 

Washington, D.C. 20224

 

 

Attention: CC:LR: T(EE-158-86, 160-86)

 

 

Dear Sir:

The recently issued proposed regulation 1.401(k)-1 provides that, for plan years beginning after 1988, elective contributions and matching contributions may not be used to satisfy the requirement of providing a minimum benefit to non-key employees in top-heavy plans.

When TEFRA was adopted, Section 416(c)(2)(C) provided that elective contributions attributable to a salary reduction arrangement could not be taken into account for purposes of providing the minimum required benefit to non-key employees in top-heavy plans. Congress repealed this rule with respect to plan years beginning after 1984.

None of the multiple pieces of legislation enacted or proposed since that date has reinstated this prohibition; yet IRS has nonetheless prohibited not only elective contributions, but matching contributions as well, from being used to satisfy the top-heavy minimum contribution rule.

The proposed regulation directly contravenes existing law, and the intent of Congress in repealing Section 416(c)(2)(C). Unless and until legislation is enacted to prohibit such use, the proposed regulation should be revised to permit both elective and matching contributions to be used to satisfy the top-heavy minimum contribution requirement.

Very truly yours,

 

 

Barbara Lein

 

General Counsel

 

Pension Planning Company, Inc.

 

New York, NY

 

 

cc: Senator Alfonse D'Amato

 

Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan

 

Congressman Dan Rostenkowski

 

Congressman Bill Green

 

Senator Robert Dole
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Authors
    Lein, Barbara
  • Institutional Authors
    Pension Planning Co., Inc.
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    elective contribution
    top-heavy plans
    salary reduction arrangement
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 88-7497
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    88 TNT 184-24
Copy RID