Menu
Tax Notes logo

Tax Court Asked to Redetermine Deficiencies, Penalties

JUN. 30, 2021

Michael V. Moore et vir v. Commissioner

DATED JUN. 30, 2021
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES

Michael V. Moore et vir v. Commissioner

[Editor's Note:

The exhibits can be viewed in the PDF version of the document.

]

Michael V. Moore & Mark A. Bearak,
Petitioners
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Respondent

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

PETITION

Petitioners hereby petition for a redetermination of the deficiency set forth by the Commissioner in the Notice of Deficiency dated April 1, 2021. In support thereof, petitioners allege:

1. At the time of the filing of the petition, Petitioners resided in New York, New York.

2. Petitioners timely filed their U.S. Individual Income Tax Return (Form 1040) for taxable years 2017 and 2018 (the "Returns").

3. The notice of deficiency dated April 1, 2021 was issued by the office of the Internal Revenue Service located 575 N. Pennsylvania Street, Stop SB462, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-1580 (the "Notice"). A complete copy of the Notice, as redacted pursuant to Rule 27 of the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, is attached as Exhibit A.

4. The deficiency in income tax as reflected in the Notice is in the amount of $14,671 plus penalties in the amount of $2,934.20 for taxable year 2017, and $109,564 plus penalties in the amount of $21,912.80 for taxable year 2018, all of which are in dispute (2017 and 2018, the "Years at Issue").

5. Respondent's determination, as set forth in the Notice, is based on the following errors:

a. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' meals and entertainment expenses in the amounts of $268 and $5,718 in taxable years 2017 and 2018, respectively.

b. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' travel expenses in the amounts of $190 and $9,226 in taxable years 2017 and 2018, respectively.

c. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' rental expenses for Other Business Property in the amounts of $1,300 and $27,788 in taxable years 2017 and 2018, respectively.

d. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' rental expenses for Vehicles, Machinery, and Equipment in the amount of $6,878 in taxable year 2017.

e. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' office expenses in the amounts of $12,926 and $1,04 in taxable years 2017 and 2018, respectively.

f. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' legal and professional service expenses in the amounts of $2,288 and $6,553 in taxable years 2017 and 2018, respectively.

g. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' car and truck expenses in the amounts of $7,058 and $9,714 in taxable years 2017 and 2018, respectively.

h. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' advertising expenses in the amounts of $1,332 and $16,671 in taxable years 2017 and 2018, respectively Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' other expenses in the amount of $2,278 in taxable year 2018.

i. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' utilities expenses in the amount of $7,869 in taxable year 2018.

j. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' takes and licenses expenses in the amount of $25 in taxable year 2018.

k. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' taxes and licenses expenses in the amount of $5,725 in taxable year 2018.

l. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' repairs and maintenance insurance expenses in the amount of $5,725 in taxable year 2018.

m. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' insurance expenses in the amount of $2,508 in taxable year 2018.

n. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' depreciation and I.R.C. § 179 expense in the amount of $3,525 in taxable year 2018.

o. Respondent erred when he disallowed Petitioners' cost of goods sold in the amount of $194,396 in taxable year 2018.

p. Respondent erred when he determined that the penalty under I.R.C. § 6662 applied in each of the Years at Issue.

6. The facts upon which petitioners rely in support of their petition are as follows:

a. During the Years at Issue, Petitioner Mark A. Bearak was self-employed as an architect and an adjunct professor architecture at Columbia University.

b. During the Years at Issue, Mr. Bearak reported items of income, credit, expense, and deduction on a Schedule C attached to the Returns.

c. Mr. Bearak incurred and paid meals and entertainment expenses related to his business during the Years at Issue and therefore is entitled to the deductions claimed for these items on the Returns in the amounts reported.

d. Mr. Bearak incurred and paid travel expenses related to his business during the Years at Issue and therefore is entitled to the deductions claimed for these items on the Returns in the amounts reported.

e. Mr. Bearak incurred and paid rental expenses for other business property related to his business during the Years at Issue and therefore is entitled to the deductions claimed for these items on the Returns in the amounts reported.

f. Mr. Bearak incurred and paid rental expenses for vehicles, machinery, and equipment related to his business during taxable year 2017 and therefore is entitled to the deductions claimed for these items in the amounts reported.

g. Mr. Bearak incurred and paid office expenses relate to his business during the Years at Issue and therefore is entitled to the deductions claimed for these items on the Returns in the amounts reported.

h. Mr. Bearak incurred and paid legal and professional service expenses related to his business during the Years at Issue and therefore is entitled to the deductions claimed for these items on the Returns in the amounts reported.

i. Mr. Bearak incurred and paid car and truck expenses related to his business during the Years at Issue and therefore is entitled to the deductions claimed for these items on the Returns in the amounts reported.

j. Mr. Bearak incurred and paid advertising expenses related to his business during the Years at Issue and therefore is entitled to the deductions claimed for these items on the Returns in the amounts reported.

k. Mr. Bearak incurred and paid other expenses related to his business during taxable year 2018 and therefore is entitled to the deductions claimed for these items in the amounts reported.

l. Mr. Bearak incurred and paid utilities expenses related to his business during taxable year 2018 and therefore is entitled to the deductions claimed for these items in the amounts reported.

m. Mr. Bearak incurred and paid taxes and license expenses related to his business during taxable year 2018 and therefore is entitled to the deductions claimed for these items in the amounts reported.

n. Mr. Bearak incurred and paid repairs and maintenance expenses related to his business during taxable year 2018 and therefore is entitled to the deductions claimed for these items in the amounts reported.

o. Mr. Bearak incurred and paid insurance expenses related to his business during taxable year 2018 and therefore is entitled to the deductions claimed for these items in the amounts reported.

p. Mr. Bearak was entitled to a depreciation deduction for property related to his business during 2018 and therefore is entitled to the deductions claimed for these items in the amounts reported.

q. Mr. Bearak properly reported his businesses' costs of goods sold as being $194,396 in taxable year 2018.

r. To the extent there is any understatement of tax on either of the Returns, Petitioners acted in good faith and have reasonable cause for such understatement.

WHEREFORE, Petitioners pray that the court (i) redetermine the deficiency as set forth above, (ii) determine that the penalty under I.R.C. § 6662, to the extent there is any deficiency, cannot be sustained, and (iii) give such other further relief or recovery to which Petitioners may be entitled.

Respectfully Submitted,

Daniel P. Ryan
Counsel for the Petitioners
Tax Court Bar No. RD0510
SULLIVAN & WORCESTER LLP
One Post Office Square
Boston, Massachusetts 02109-2129
(617) 338-2800
(617) 338-2880 (fax)

Date: June 29, 2021

DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
Copy RID