U.S. Tax Court Releases Stats on Pro Bono Tax Clinics
U.S. Tax Court Releases Stats on Pro Bono Tax Clinics
- Institutional AuthorsU.S. Tax Court
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 2015-11267
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2015 TNT 91-55
May 2015
Clinic and Pro Bono Update
113 Participating Clinics
Pro Bono(Calendar Call Programs) 26 Cities
16 programs in 26 cities (2014 -- 19 cities)
Participating Clinics appear at Calendar Call in many cities
Brooklyn Legal Services
Kansas city Legal Services
Koreatown Youth and Community Center (LA)
Bet Tzedek Legal Services (LA)
Farmworkers Project of Philadelphia
Hoftsra University (Westbury)
University of Baltimore (returning clinic)
Catholic Univeristy
New Calendar Call Programs
(Additional Cities or Additional Coverage)
Phoenix
District of Columbia
Baltimore
Boston
Columbus, OH
IRS Student Practice Programs
45 Cities
IRS Submits One Letter to the Court
Students supervised by a Chief Counsel Attorney represent the Commissioner
Often at Calendar Call and sometimes at Trial
Approx 27,300 cases pending
15,750 R and 11,550 S
Total Pro Se 72.5% (70% last year)
58% R Cases -- Pro Se (53% last year)
92% S & SL cases Pro Se (same as last year)
Submissions
The Court asked questions of clinics and calendar call programs
During the calendar year preceding the submission of this letter, the clinic consulted with approximately [number] of taxpayers with cases pending in the Court and . . .
With respect to the consultations, clinic entered an appearance for approximately [number] of taxpayers.
Totals compiled from all clinics responding -2014
Clinics consulted with 2,241 taxpayers (groups)
Entered an appearance in 641 (of the 2,241 above) cases.
Numbers are similar to last 3 years
Great disparity in your answers
Ten clinics account for one half of the 2,241 consultations (last year five)
Range of clinic consultations -- high of 500 and low of 1
Range of Entry of Appearance -- high of 100 and low of 1
Calendar Call Programs Assisted more than 262 Petitioners in 2014
Of the 113 Clinics, approx. 90 regularly appear at Calendar Call
Clinic with Outside Attorneys
Answer
In 2014 approx 90 of the participating clinics had some relationship with outside attorneys. Some have formal pro bono panel -- others less formal. (up from 75 in 2013)
The Court wants your assistance as to what works, and what does not work
We can continue to update our Participation Guidelines to improve Access to Justice
Sometimes we try new things and they don't work so well. That is OK. We can continue to modify systems.
Suggestions
The Court welcomes your suggestions
The Court needs your input
Please take a few moments when sending you participation letter to us to let us know what is working and what is not.
Notice: Trial At: [Place of Trial]
Issued 30 days before trial to every self-represented petitioner
The parties are reminded that the case is calendared for trial at the Trial Session. . . .
The case will remain on the Court's trial calendar unless both parties sign an agreed decision and submit it to the Court or. . . . .
If you fail to appear at the Trial Session the case may be dismissed
The Court's records indicated you are not represented by counsel
The parties should consider arriving at 9am in or to be ready for the 10am calendar call
Petitioners should identify themselves to the Trial Clerk
The parties can use the time prior to the 10am calendar call to discuss remaining matters in the case
Attached is a copy of a letter from a Tax Clinic that serves the city. You are encouraged to contact a Tax Clinic as soon as possible
Concerns expressed about petitioners who may be in need of an interpreter
(1) Reminder that you have the option of submitting an additional stuffer notice in Spanish
(2) Note the FAQs
Understand English?
While All Proceedings in Court are in English
you may be able to get help
Many Low Income Taxpayer Clinics have resources to help
A Party may file a motion asking for the Court to pay for an interpreter -- Petitioner needs to establish 3 things:
1. A language barrier exists
2. Petitioner does not have the financial means to pay for an interpreter
3. The case presents a substantial question which is not frivolous
The Judge has discretion to grant or deny the request
File a motion as soon as possible -- but no later than
30 days prior to trial
The motion shall contain the 3 prerequisites
1. A language barrier exists
2. Petitioner can't afford to pay
3. Case presents a substantial question which is not frivolous
Judge should make a clear announcement about availability of clinic and or calendar call program
Judge should emphasize that there is no cost to petitioner to meet with volunteers
Assistance in some cities in gaining entrance to Federal Buildings
Difficult for clinic and calendar call program to assist when place of trial is changed from designated city to other cities.
Consider more video conferences, particularly to assist disabled petitioners.
Remind petitioners that the Tax Court is not part of the IRS.
Make the fee waiver package more accessible
Permit the volunteers additional time to meet with petitioners to better assist
Settlement days prior to calendar call
Scheduling issues -- overlapping cities
Mixed views on the value of answers in S cases
Approximately 78 Weeks of Sessions
Small Cases -- 27 Weeks
Hybrid -- 8 Weeks
Regular -- 43 Weeks (not including "Specials")
- Institutional AuthorsU.S. Tax Court
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 2015-11267
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2015 TNT 91-55