Menu
Tax Notes logo

U.S. Tax Court Releases Stats on Pro Bono Tax Clinics

MAY 1, 2015

U.S. Tax Court Releases Stats on Pro Bono Tax Clinics

DATED MAY 1, 2015
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Institutional Authors
    U.S. Tax Court
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2015-11267
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2015 TNT 91-55
United States Tax Court ABA-Pro Bono and Tax Clinic Committee Update

 

May 2015

 

 

Clinic and Pro Bono Update

 

113 Participating Clinics

 

 

  • Pro Bono(Calendar Call Programs) 26 Cities

  • 16 programs in 26 cities (2014 -- 19 cities)

  • Participating Clinics appear at Calendar Call in many cities

New Clinics

 

 

Brooklyn Legal Services

 

 

Kansas city Legal Services

 

 

Koreatown Youth and Community Center (LA)

 

 

Bet Tzedek Legal Services (LA)

 

 

Farmworkers Project of Philadelphia

 

 

Hoftsra University (Westbury)

 

 

University of Baltimore (returning clinic)

 

 

Catholic Univeristy

 

 

New Calendar Call Programs

 

(Additional Cities or Additional Coverage)

 

 

Phoenix

 

 

District of Columbia

 

 

Baltimore

 

 

Boston

 

 

Columbus, OH

 

 

IRS Student Practice Programs

 

 

45 Cities

 

 

  • IRS Submits One Letter to the Court

  • Students supervised by a Chief Counsel Attorney represent the Commissioner

  • Often at Calendar Call and sometimes at Trial

Counsel v. Pro Se

 

 

  • Approx 27,300 cases pending

  • 15,750 R and 11,550 S

  • Total Pro Se 72.5% (70% last year)

  • 58% R Cases -- Pro Se (53% last year)

  • 92% S & SL cases Pro Se (same as last year)

Clinic and Calendar Call

 

Submissions

 

 

The Court asked questions of clinics and calendar call programs

 

 

  • During the calendar year preceding the submission of this letter, the clinic consulted with approximately [number] of taxpayers with cases pending in the Court and . . .

  • With respect to the consultations, clinic entered an appearance for approximately [number] of taxpayers.

Answer

 

 

Totals compiled from all clinics responding -2014

 

 

  • Clinics consulted with 2,241 taxpayers (groups)

  • Entered an appearance in 641 (of the 2,241 above) cases.

  • Numbers are similar to last 3 years

  • Great disparity in your answers

  • Ten clinics account for one half of the 2,241 consultations (last year five)

  • Range of clinic consultations -- high of 500 and low of 1

  • Range of Entry of Appearance -- high of 100 and low of 1

Assistance by Calendar Call Programs (stand alone)

 

 

  • Calendar Call Programs Assisted more than 262 Petitioners in 2014

  • Of the 113 Clinics, approx. 90 regularly appear at Calendar Call

Describe the Relationship of the

 

Clinic with Outside Attorneys

 

 

Answer

 

 

  • In 2014 approx 90 of the participating clinics had some relationship with outside attorneys. Some have formal pro bono panel -- others less formal. (up from 75 in 2013)

Improvements -- Changes

 

 

  • The Court wants your assistance as to what works, and what does not work

  • We can continue to update our Participation Guidelines to improve Access to Justice

  • Sometimes we try new things and they don't work so well. That is OK. We can continue to modify systems.

Clinic and Calendar Call

 

Suggestions

 

 

  • The Court welcomes your suggestions

  • The Court needs your input

  • Please take a few moments when sending you participation letter to us to let us know what is working and what is not.

The 30 Day Notice

 

 

Notice: Trial At: [Place of Trial]

 

 

  • Issued 30 days before trial to every self-represented petitioner

  • The parties are reminded that the case is calendared for trial at the Trial Session. . . .

  • The case will remain on the Court's trial calendar unless both parties sign an agreed decision and submit it to the Court or. . . . .

  • If you fail to appear at the Trial Session the case may be dismissed

  • The Court's records indicated you are not represented by counsel

  • The parties should consider arriving at 9am in or to be ready for the 10am calendar call

  • Petitioners should identify themselves to the Trial Clerk

  • The parties can use the time prior to the 10am calendar call to discuss remaining matters in the case

  • Attached is a copy of a letter from a Tax Clinic that serves the city. You are encouraged to contact a Tax Clinic as soon as possible

Suggestions in 2014

 

 

  • Concerns expressed about petitioners who may be in need of an interpreter

  • (1) Reminder that you have the option of submitting an additional stuffer notice in Spanish

  • (2) Note the FAQs

What should I do if I don't speak or

 

Understand English?

 

 

While All Proceedings in Court are in English

 

you may be able to get help

 

 

  • Many Low Income Taxpayer Clinics have resources to help

  • A Party may file a motion asking for the Court to pay for an interpreter -- Petitioner needs to establish 3 things:

Interpreters

 

 

  • 1. A language barrier exists

  • 2. Petitioner does not have the financial means to pay for an interpreter

  • 3. The case presents a substantial question which is not frivolous

  • The Judge has discretion to grant or deny the request

If I need an interpreter, what shall I do?

 

 

File a motion as soon as possible -- but no later than

 

30 days prior to trial

 

 

  • The motion shall contain the 3 prerequisites

  • 1. A language barrier exists

  • 2. Petitioner can't afford to pay

  • 3. Case presents a substantial question which is not frivolous

Other Suggestions

 

 

  • Judge should make a clear announcement about availability of clinic and or calendar call program

  • Judge should emphasize that there is no cost to petitioner to meet with volunteers

  • Assistance in some cities in gaining entrance to Federal Buildings

More

 

 

  • Difficult for clinic and calendar call program to assist when place of trial is changed from designated city to other cities.

  • Consider more video conferences, particularly to assist disabled petitioners.

  • Remind petitioners that the Tax Court is not part of the IRS.

More

 

 

  • Make the fee waiver package more accessible

  • Permit the volunteers additional time to meet with petitioners to better assist

  • Settlement days prior to calendar call

  • Scheduling issues -- overlapping cities

  • Mixed views on the value of answers in S cases

Fall 2015

 

 

Approximately 78 Weeks of Sessions

 

 

  • Small Cases -- 27 Weeks

  • Hybrid -- 8 Weeks

  • Regular -- 43 Weeks (not including "Specials")

DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Institutional Authors
    U.S. Tax Court
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2015-11267
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2015 TNT 91-55
Copy RID