Menu
Tax Notes logo

Ways and Means Democrats: EIP Cards May Be Causing Confusion

MAY 28, 2020

Ways and Means Democrats: EIP Cards May Be Causing Confusion

DATED MAY 28, 2020
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Authors
    Lewis, Rep. John
    DelBene, Rep. Suzan K.
    Sánchez, Rep. Linda T.
    Suozzi, Rep. Thomas
    Chu, Rep. Judy
    Moore, Rep. Gwen
    Boyle, Rep. Brendan F.
  • Institutional Authors
    U.S. House of Representatives
    U.S. House Ways and Means Committee
    U.S. House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    2020-20463
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2020 TNTF 104-27

May 28, 2020

The Honorable Steven T. Mnuchin
Secretary
U.S. Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20220

Dear Secretary Mnuchin,

We write regarding the recent announcement that the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) began sending economic impact payments (EIPs) to an estimated four million individuals by prepaid debit card.

Ensuring timely and accurate EIP distribution is a priority, especially given the economic pressures of the COVID-19 pandemic. Treasury recently stated that these cards are “secure, easy to use, and allow [Treasury] to deliver Americans their money quickly.” However, recent reports indicate the cards are creating confusion and actually may delay when Americans receive this emergency assistance.

In the last week, there are reports that taxpayers are confused by the EIP prepaid debit cards and are concerned that they are scams. For starters, the cards arrive in a plain white envelope from “Money Network Cardholder Services,” which is not a name that taxpayers recognize. Further, there is no indication on the envelope or the card itself that it is an EIP or that it comes from Treasury. Alarmingly, if an individual calls the number listed in the accompanying materials, the activation line requires the individual to enter a substantial portion of his or her Social Security number.

When added together, these facts are leading many individuals to believe that the debit cards are junk mail or a scam. Indeed, the Iowa Attorney General noted in a recent article that the office is getting “lots of calls” from people thinking the cards arriving in the mail are a scam. This is particularly concerning because many taxpayers may be discarding or destroying their EIPs upon receipt, and it is unclear what recourse they will have subsequently to access their payments with or without additional fees.

In light of these concerns, we request that you please provide the following information by June 2, 2020:

1. The number of cards that have been mailed to date and the number activated;

2. The number of cards for which taxpayers have requested a replacement and, if known, the reason for the replacement;

3. A schedule of all fees associated with the cards, including replacement and mailing fees;

4. The total dollar amount of all fees charged to users to date and, if known, the reason for the fee; and

5. The criteria used for selecting these taxpayers to receive a card instead of a paper check. Thank you, in advance, for your prompt attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

The Honorable John Lewis, Chairman
Subcommittee on Oversight

The Honorable Suzan K. DelBene

The Honorable Linda T. Sánchez

The Honorable Thomas R. Suozzi

The Honorable Judy Chu

The Honorable Gwen Moore

The Honorable Brendan F. Boyle

DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Authors
    Lewis, Rep. John
    DelBene, Rep. Suzan K.
    Sánchez, Rep. Linda T.
    Suozzi, Rep. Thomas
    Chu, Rep. Judy
    Moore, Rep. Gwen
    Boyle, Rep. Brendan F.
  • Institutional Authors
    U.S. House of Representatives
    U.S. House Ways and Means Committee
    U.S. House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    2020-20463
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2020 TNTF 104-27
Copy RID