PARTNER'S ESTATE NOT REQUIRED TO INCLUDE DISCHARGE-OF-INDEBTEDNESS INCOME.

Bradley C. Plovan, for respondent.

[3] On October 10, 2000, decedent died. His estate was administered by Patrick Martinez and was closed on June 19, 2001. When the petition was filed, Patrick Martinez resided in Timonium, Maryland.

The Partnership's Debts

[4] At all relevant times, decedent was a general partner in Notchcliff Associates (the partnership), a Maryland general partnership that was engaged in the business of developing a continuing care facility.

[5] On April 9, 1985, the partnership borrowed $18 million from The Commercial Bank (the bank) for use in its business. On that same date, decedent and other general partners of the partnership executed a personal guaranty agreement, whereby they jointly and severally guaranteed this loan. On May 29, 1987, the partnership borrowed an additional $2,956,000 from the bank.³

The Partnership's Bankruptcy Case

[6] On June 30, 1988, the partnership initiated a bankruptcy case by filing a voluntary chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland (the bankruptcy court). On November 13, 1989, the bankruptcy court appointed a chapter 11 trustee (the trustee) to administer the partnership's assets and to develop an orderly liquidation and sale of the assets.

Decedent's Contribution Agreement

[7] The trustee negotiated with the partnership's general partners, including decedent, to obtain some contribution from them to pay the partnership's debts. The trustee filed a reorganization plan which, among other things, proposed a means whereby general partners of the partnership could contribute to a partnership release fund as a means of resolving the partnership's claims and other creditor's claims against its general partners. On November 27, 1990, the bankruptcy court confirmed the plan.

[8] Thereafter, the trustee reached a negotiated settlement with some of the general partners, including decedent, whereby in exchange for paying agreed-upon sums to the partnership's bankruptcy estate, the contributing partners would be discharged from liability as permitted by the confirmed bankruptcy plan. On September 15, 1995, decedent executed a contribution agreement and pursuant to its terms contributed $15,000 to the partnership's bankruptcy estate in exchange for release of "all claims or potential claims of creditors against * * * [decedent] arising out of or related to" the partnership.

[9] On December 19, 1995, the bankruptcy court entered an order approving the contribution agreement. In its order, the bankruptcy court specifically discharged and released decedent from any and all liability to the trustee and the bank arising out of or relating to the partnership, decedent's status as a general partner in the partnership, and the April 9, 1985, personal guaranty agreement. In addition, the bankruptcy court's order released decedent from "the claims or potential claims of all creditors" of the partnership. The bankruptcy court further ordered that decedent "is subject to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court."

Tax Reporting

[10] For the 1995 tax year, the partnership issued decedent a Schedule K-1, Partner's Share of Income, Credits, Deductions, etc., allocating to him $397,640 of discharge of indebtedness income. Decedent excluded this entire amount from his gross income as reported on his 1995 Federal income tax return.

Notice of Deficiency

[11] By notice of deficiency, respondent determined that $397,640 of discharged debt should be included in decedent's 1995 income.

[13] For purposes of section 108, a "title 11 case" is defined as "a case under title 11 of the United States Code (relating to bankruptcy), but only if the taxpayer is under the jurisdiction of the court in such case and the discharge of indebtedness is granted by the court or is pursuant to a plan approved by the court." Sec. 108(d)(2).

[14] The partnership's chapter 11 bankruptcy was a case under title 11 of the United States Code. See 11 U.S.C. ch. 11 (2000). Pursuant to its December 19, 1995, order, the bankruptcy court discharged and released decedent from all liability to the trustee, the bank, and all other creditors that might have claims arising from or relating to the partnership, decedent's status as a general partner in the partnership, and the April 9, 1985, personal guaranty agreement. In the same order, the bankruptcy court explicitly asserted its jurisdiction over decedent for this purpose. Giving due regard to principles of judicial comity, we discern no reason to second-guess the bankruptcy court's assertion of jurisdiction over decedent in the partnership's chapter 11 bankruptcy case. See 28 U.S.C. secs. 151, 157, 1334 (2000).

[15] We conclude that decedent's debts in question were discharged "in a title 11 case" within the meaning of section 108(d)(2). Accordingly, we hold that decedent's discharge of indebtedness income is excludable from gross income pursuant to section 108(a)(1)(A).

[16] We have considered all arguments raised by the parties. Arguments not addressed herein are moot, irrelevant, or without merit.

[17] To reflect the foregoing,

[18] Decision will be entered for petitioner.

²Essentially identical issues are presented in three other cases also decided today: Ralph J. and Joan B. Mirarchi, docket No. 6638-02; Chester L. Price, docket No. 6639-02; and Jose Gracia and Nancy Gracia, docket No. 6642-02.

³The Apr. 9, 1985, personal guaranty agreement also applied to this loan.