Fordham Seeks Clarity on Tax Treatment of Law School Debt
Fordham Seeks Clarity on Tax Treatment of Law School Debt
- AuthorsTreanor, William Michael
- Institutional AuthorsFordham University
- Cross-ReferenceFor the Tax Court summary opinion in Melissa L. Moloney v.
- Code Sections
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 2007-8749
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2007 TNT 66-20
March 22,2007
Mr. Eric Solomon
Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy)
U.S. Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 3120 MT
Washington, D.C. 20220
Dear Mr. Solomon,
Since Moloney v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 2006- 53, which included a footnote that only medicine, nursing and teaching were "certain professions" eligible for tax-free loan forgiveness under section 108(f), we at Fordham Law School have been concerned about the tax treatment of our law school loan forgiveness program. Given the high cost of law school education and the enormous debt burden of so many of our students, this program is an important tool in enabling and encouraging our graduates to do public interest law. We respectfully request that, based on the legislative history and purpose of the current version of section 108(f), you issue administrative guidance that section 108(f) applies to law school loan forgiveness programs.
William Michael Treanor
Dean
Fordham University
New York, NY
Eric San Juan, Deputy Tax Legislative Counsel
Michael S. Novey, Associate Tax Legislative Counsel
Donna Welch, Internal Revenue Service Christina Glendening, Internal
Revenue Service
- AuthorsTreanor, William Michael
- Institutional AuthorsFordham University
- Cross-ReferenceFor the Tax Court summary opinion in Melissa L. Moloney v.
- Code Sections
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 2007-8749
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2007 TNT 66-20