Menu
Tax Notes logo

Private Foundation Tax Bill Would Cost $2 Billion, CBO Says

FEB. 5, 2015

Private Foundation Tax Bill Would Cost $2 Billion, CBO Says

DATED FEB. 5, 2015
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Institutional Authors
    Congressional Budget Office
  • Cross-Reference
    H.R. 640, as approved by the House Ways and Means Committee

    2015 TNT 23-45: Proposed Legislation.
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2015-3115
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2015 TNT 26-44

 

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE

 

 

February 5, 2015

 

 

As ordered reported by the House Committee on Ways and Means on February 4, 2015

H.R. 640 would amend the Internal Revenue Code to restructure the excise tax on net investment income of private foundations from a dual-rate system (tax rates of 1 percent and 2 percent) to a single-rate system with a rate of 1 percent. Under current law, the calculation of the amount of excise tax differs depending on whether the foundation is exempt from income taxes or not, but in both cases a foundation faces a general excise tax rate of 2 percent on its net investment income. The rate of tax is reduced to 1 percent when a foundation has made charitable distributions in a year that exceed an amount based largely on its historical rate of distributions relative to its assets.

The staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimates that enacting H.R. 640 would reduce revenues, thus increasing federal budget deficits, by about $2.0 billion over the 2015-2025 period. The estimated budgetary effects of H.R. 640 are shown in the following table.

                              CHANGES IN REVENUES

 

 

                     By Fiscal Year, in Millions of Dollars

 

 ______________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 Estimated Revenues

 

                                                                 2015-  2015-

 

   2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022 2023 2024 2025 2020   2025

 

 ____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

      *  -129  -172  -180  -187  -195  -203  -212 -221 -230 -240  -863 -1,969

 

 

 Source: Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation.

 

 

 Note: * = less than $500,000.

 

 

Although enacting H.R. 640 would affect revenues, the provisions of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 do not apply to the legislation because it includes a provision that would direct the Office of Management and Budget to exclude the estimated changes in revenues from the scorecards used to enforce the pay-as-you-go rules.

JCT has determined that the bill contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.

The CBO staff contact for this estimate is Nathaniel Frentz. The estimate was approved by David Weiner, Assistant Director for Tax Analysis.

DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Institutional Authors
    Congressional Budget Office
  • Cross-Reference
    H.R. 640, as approved by the House Ways and Means Committee

    2015 TNT 23-45: Proposed Legislation.
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2015-3115
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2015 TNT 26-44
Copy RID