Menu
Tax Notes logo

Lawmakers Cite Concerns With Proposed Regs Providing Guidance on Patented Transactions

FEB. 15, 2008

Lawmakers Cite Concerns With Proposed Regs Providing Guidance on Patented Transactions

DATED FEB. 15, 2008
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
[Editor's Note: Several of the authors' signatures on this letter are illegible. For the full text of the letter, see Doc 2008-5144 .]

 

February 15, 2008

 

 

Mr. Eric Solomon

 

Assistant Secretary of Treasury for Tax Policy

 

U.S. Department of Treasury

 

3120 Main Treasury

 

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

 

Washington, DC 20220

 

 

Ms. Linda E. Stiff

 

Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue

 

Internal Revenue Service

 

1111 Constitution Avenue, NW

 

Washington, D.C. 20044

 

Re: Proposed regulations (REG-129916-07) affecting patented transactions (72 Fed. Reg. 54615, Sept. 26, 2007)

 

Dear Mr. Solomon and Ms. Stiff:

We are writing to express concerns about the proposed regulations above affecting patented tax methods. It is our understanding that the proposed regulations would require separate disclosures be submitted with federal income tax returns by taxpayers who have participated in any tax planning method that has been issued a patent by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) or for which a patent application is pending.

It has been brought to our attention that the proposed regulations will impose substantial paperwork burdens on not only individual taxpaying Americans, but also the IRS itself. We are also concerned that based on this rule, individual taxpayers will be discouraged from calculating their taxes based on such patented methods.

In addition, the proposed regulations treat differently those who paid for a license to utilize the patented tax method and those who did not. As we understand it, those who properly paid for a license would be subject to the reportable transaction rules, while those who utilized the patented method without paying for a license would not be subject to additional reporting. If so, this treatment would unfairly punish those who properly sought and obtained a license to use the patented method and could encourage patent infringement.

Therefore we ask that the Department and the IRS carefully and fairly review the policy decision to require separate reporting of patented tax methods. Of course, we do not expect you to take any action that would be inconsistent with applicable rules, regulations, procedures, or ethical guidelines. Thank you for your consideration.

Most sincerely,

 

 

Trent Franks

 

Ken Calvert

 

Walter B. Jones

 

Ron Lewis

 

Anna Hunt

 

Steve King

 

Pete Sessions

 

John Boozman

 

Thomas Davis

 

Pat Tiberi

 

Congress of the United States

 

Washington, D.C.
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
Copy RID