Menu
Tax Notes logo

From Tax Promise to Policy: Biden’s First Year in Office

David D. Stewart: Welcome to the podcast. I'm David Stewart, editor in chief of Tax Notes Today International. This week: promises to policy.

This January marked the end of President Biden's first year in office. With Democrats controlling the White House and both houses of Congress, it seemed like the Biden administration would have a clear path to pass the president's main campaign promises, including several tax items and priorities.

Although we saw some important tax changes under the American Rescue Plan Act, enacted early on, the president's signature proposals have all but grinded to a halt in Congress. With the uncertainty surrounding the Build Back Better legislation, we decided that now is a good time to look at the Biden administration's initial tax policy promises and where those proposals stand today.

Here to talk more about this is Tax Notes reporter Jonathan Curry. Jonathan, welcome back to the podcast.

Jonathan Curry: Hey, Dave. Great to be back here.

David D. Stewart: All right. To begin with, could you give listeners a recap of what President Biden's big tax policy promises were?

Jonathan Curry: OK. Yeah. Sure. If you remember, I mean, he had a lot of proposals. If you were to go to his website back when he was campaigning, it was, you know, pages and pages of different tax proposals. To go over the headliners: he wanted to raise the corporate tax rate to 28 percent, up from 21 percent. He wanted to impose a new tax, a corporate minimum tax on book income. He wanted to raise the individual income tax rate back up to 39.6 percent, kind of reverting it back to pre-Tax Cuts and Jobs Act era tax rates. He wanted to cap itemized deductions above a $400,000 income threshold, and you're going to hear about that $400,000 income threshold a lot.

He also had a lot of things on sort of near the high-income front. He wanted to tax long-term capital gains the same as income, so that 39.6 percent that would only apply on those making more than $1 million. He also had a big proposal to end the tax free step-up and basis at death, again, above a $1 million threshold.

Other things he had on his website were to raise the payroll tax rate on those making more than $400,000. Although the outset that was never going to happen, just due to do the complex procedural rules in Congress. You can't touch the payroll tax rate in the reconciliation procedures that they're working under. So that one was never going to happen, but it was there.

Some of the other big ones he had was he wanted to expand the child tax credit and the child independent care credit. And he also wanted to reform GILTI by doubling the rate and making it a country-by-country calculation rather than by blending it. That's just sort of a list of some of the big things. There was still a lot of other little kind of tweaks and reforms and things on the margins, so there was a lot.

David D. Stewart: So, now that we've covered what was promised, let's talk about what's actually happened with those promises. So, starting with the American Rescue Plan Act, which was widely viewed as a win for President Biden, so how did that legislation fit in with the tax proposals from the campaign?

Jonathan Curry: Yeah, sure. I mean, that was a big bill for sure. It was $1.9 trillion overall, and it did have a tax component, although it was definitely not the main part of it. And that tax component was very much family-oriented.

If you remember from what I was just mentioning before of what he was calling for, he did want to expand the child tax credit. And he got that. He had a big temporary increase in the size of that credit for 2021. Plus it was made fully refundable, and half of the years' credits were distributed in monthly payments from July through December. The child independent care credit was also boosted, again just for one year. And the earned income tax credit was also expanded for a limited time. So again, if you didn't pick up on it, a lot of this was just for one year. It was just for 2021.

The bill did move pretty quickly. It was actually faster than I expected, but so much of it was just temporary relief. I think it was pretty clearly intended to be a down payment, kind of get this into law, get people used to it. And then there'll be more support for it that they're already feeling the benefits of a bigger child tax credit. And we saw that. Later proposals in the Build Back Better plan tried to expand on these.

I do think it's worth with noting that this was kind of just the easy stuff though. On the tax front, it was really just offering purely tax relief. There weren't tax hikes that would generate pushback. And in terms of following through on his tax promises, you know, given the huge amount that he had promised, this was just a tiny piece of it.

David D. Stewart: All right. So, turning to the rest of the policy promises, such as not raising taxes on anyone earning less than $400,000 a year. How have the rest of those plans panned out?

Jonathan Curry: Yeah, so the $400,000 pledge has come up a lot. I think by and large, he's still sticking to that with a few caveats. He's still not pushing to tinker with your middle class income tax rates or anything like that. But the House version of the bill that came out would've included a proposal to double the federal tobacco tax, which, if you're anyone buying cigarettes, no matter how much income you have, technically your taxes are going to go up.

And there were some scenarios where, for example, let's say a taxpayer doesn't make $400,000 every year, but they might have a lot of income in one year from maybe you sell a house or you come into a big inheritance of some sort. Under his proposal, you might technically fall short of the pledge if the tax pre step-up and basis was ended. But you know, that proposal doesn't look to be on the table anyway. On the whole, I think Biden has still stuck to that pledge, even if it has led to some pretty kind of wonky ways to make the policies fit his promise.

David D. Stewart: All right. Now turning to the other major piece of legislation that was discussed last year, the Build Back Better Act. We saw it go through many iterations from introduction until today. So where do things stand now?

Jonathan Curry: I think you touched on it in your introduction really perfectly. Things are at a stand still. There was a ton of hustle on this late last year and they just couldn't get it done. Biden and other congressional leaders had talked about pushing it to early January, and then a little bit later, and then a little bit later, and now they're talking about trying to pass a bill of some sort by the time Biden gives his State of the Union speech on March 1. That's less than a month from now.

What do they plan to pass by March 1? I mean, who knows? The one thing we can say for sure is that it's going to be a lot smaller than what Biden had envisioned by magnitudes at this point. Sens. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., and Joe Manchin III, D-W.Va., haven't been nearly as eager to pass a bill, so really it all comes down to what are they OK with passing? And honestly, I'm still sort of surprised we don't know the answer to that yet.

Manchin keeps saying he hasn't heard from the president about how to move forward. The White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki is always saying that she won't comment on private conversations, but we're always in touch with senior staff and whatnot. According to the White House, they're moving forward. According to Manchin, they're not. I don't know. They're a little bit at a standstill is probably the best way to put it right now.

I do remember last October, the White House made a big announcement about how they've come up with a framework that all Democrats can agree with, including senators Manchin and Sinema. But clearly that's been thrown out the window at this point.

David D. Stewart: So, how does the current iteration of this bill compare with what was originally set out?

Jonathan Curry: I guess that depends on what you mean by current iteration. So if you mean the House and Senate versions of the Build Back Better plan, they had big differences from what Biden initially set out to do, but they're still substantial pieces of legislation. Biden's initial tax proposals, they really seemed like they were intended to reform the tax code overall. They wanted to do a lot on the international tax front. They wanted to change how things are taxed, how the uber wealthy are taxed. They wanted to change corporate taxation, make sure that they're paying their fair share, and things like that.

And over time, I feel like we've seen it turn into more just like pay-fors for the spending side. There are some reforms in there. I mean, changing now, international tax is done. But overall it seems like it's just more like, "How much revenue do we need? Let's try to get to that."

David D. Stewart: All right. Now there's been a lot of discussion about what must be in the bill for it to pass. So what are some of the must-have elements that are currently out there?

Jonathan Curry: That's a good question. If you had asked me a few weeks ago, I would've said that extending the expanded child tax credit was a core provision of the bill and there's no way they would ever back away from it. The White House loved to talk about it, especially the monthly payment portion of it, which they would claim lifted millions of families out of poverty and that's a huge win for the administration from the policy side.

But Manchin said he was opposed to that provision. He didn't like the idea of extending something because Biden had proposed to extend it for a little bit longer. But Manchin is under the impression that that's just a temporary thing that everyone knows is going to be made permanent at some point, and that hides the true cost of it. And making it permanent would in fact have cost a lot of revenue.

The cost of it was something like $1.5 trillion over 10 years. So something had to give, and it looks for now like the White House gave in. From a practical standpoint, the Biden administration really does need to include the international tax provisions though to bring the GILTI tax regime into compliance with the pillar 2 global minimum tax agreement. I just don't really see any way around that.

That global minimum tax could take effect as early as next year. And it would be both embarrassing on the international stage if the U.S., which has helped lead and spearhead these negotiations, can't even hold up its end of the bargain. In addition to it also being a nightmare for businesses that try to comply with a mismatched domestic and international tax regime. So even though I don't hear President Biden talking about it very much, I definitely think that that's something that his administration really wants to see in this package

David D. Stewart: Well, turning to President Biden's promises, both domestically and internationally, on climate change, the Build Back Better Act had energy tax credits and other things to address climate change. Do we expect to see any of these tax credits included in the final bill?

Jonathan Curry: I think so. The climate portion of the bill, which is made up of more than $300 billion in mostly tax incentives, doesn't seem to have been terribly controversial among Democrats. I mean, they've dropped some of the more punitive tax policies that were meant to steer the industry away from fossil fuels, but so far they've kept the incentive portion that survived largely through the House and the Senate versions of the bill that was put out by that Senate version being put out by the Senate Finance Committee. It was never actually voted on. And I don't see a lot of pushback from Manchin specifically on that and except for not wanting to punish fossil fuel industries. I would expect to see these survive if there is a bill.

David D. Stewart: All right, now we saw a lot of discussion in the second half of 2021 on this bill, but we haven't really heard anything this year. So what's been delaying further action?

Jonathan Curry: Yeah, that's definitely been a surprise because back in late December when things kind of came to a halt, they were like, 'Well, we'll pick it back up first thing in the new year.' And they haven't. I think it comes down to there's been other priorities. There was a big push to try to pass a voting rights bill and that took up some time in the legislative calendar and sort of just consumed the public mind for a few weeks. That eventually fell apart.

There's also President Biden needs to announce a new nominee for the Supreme Court. That's something, again that just sort of takes up public attention. Those are sort of tangible things that have crowded out the attention to Build Back Better. But I think intangibly, there's sort of a big issue they're facing is momentum.

There was a huge push to get this passed by the end of last year. And then December 31, or really Christmas, is sort of like an informal deadline, and they just hit a wall. And now it's a new year, and rather than working toward a deadline and building up more momentum, it seems more like they're just working to try to get it done before they completely run out of steam ahead of the midterm elections.

And once we do hit those midterm elections— now I'm not a political analyst per se, but I do think it's a good bet Democrats will lose their majority in one or both chambers of Congress. That's just historically what happens and Biden's poll numbers aren't exactly fabulous right now to try to forestall that.

David D. Stewart: OK. Now you mentioned President Biden's upcoming State of the Union address. Do we expect to hear more about tax policy there?

Jonathan Curry: They'd certainly like to pass this bill before the State of the Union, so I'm sure Biden's preference would be to take a victory lap during his speech and all the wonderful things he signed into law. Assuming that doesn't happen though, I mean, I have no doubt you'll hear him reiterate his tax policy.

But frankly I don't expect more than a few sound bites. He wants to make sure the rich and the big profitable corporations pay their fair share. He'll probably pitch his child tax credit expansion, if it's still on the table in some form by then. But in terms of selling this package to the public, I don't really think the tax policies are totally what's steering the ship.

David D. Stewart: And looking outside of Build Back Better, do we expect any other big tax changes this year from the administration or is this going to be a quiet year going into the midterms?

Jonathan Curry: Now, if you had asked me last year, when it looked like there was going to be a big Build Back Better package passed, I would've said not much. Because he would've already done so much on the tax front that it seemed like that would tide them over for quite a long time. But since the Build Back Better package is getting slimmer seemingly every single day, anything that's not included, I wouldn't be surprised to see them save it for later.

And President Biden has said as much. He said recently during a press conference with reporters, 'Just because I can't get it passed now, doesn't mean we won't pass it later. It just needs to wait a little bit longer.' So if he can't get things like the child tax credit expansion right now, I mean, I wouldn't be surprised to see him still push for it in separate legislation.

David D. Stewart: All right. Well, Jonathan, this has been great. Thank you for being here.

Jonathan Curry: Yeah, my pleasure.

David D. Stewart: And now, coming attractions. Each week we highlight new and interesting commentary in our magazines. Joining me now is Acquisitions & Engagement Editor in Chief Paige Jones. Paige, what will you have for us?

Paige Jones: Thanks, Dave. In Tax Notes Federal, Jasper Cummings shows how tax return secrecy has been a pawn in the political culture wars pursued for a century by the small groups that most benefit from secrecy. Brian Murphy and Dorian Hunt analyzed the federal tax incentives of renewable energy projects in the U.S. In Tax Notes State, Kendall Houghton and Ethan Millar discuss recent unclaimed property developments. Tom Yamachika examines which state laws apply to foreign trade zones and duty-free stores. In Tax Notes International, Joseph Andrus and Richard Collier examine the state of the arm's-length principle in light of the recent two-pillar agreement. Lewis Greenwald and Brainard Patton examine the tax treatment of active development companies under PFIC rules. And finally in Featured Analysis, Carrie Brandon Elliot reviews new regulations that clarified the foreign tax credit disallowance in section 245A(d).

David D. Stewart: That's it for this week. You can follow me online at @TaxStew, that's S-T-E-W, and be sure to follow @TaxNotes for all things tax. If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions for a future episode, you can email us at podcast@taxanalysts.org. And as always, if you like what we're doing here, please leave a rating or review wherever you download this podcast. We'll be back next week with another episode of Tax Notes Talk.

Tax Analysts Inc. does not provide tax advice or tax preparation services. The information you have seen and heard today represents the views of the presenters, which may not be the same as those of Tax Analysts Inc. It may include information obtained from third parties, and Tax Analysts Inc. makes no warranties or representations of any kind, and is not responsible for any inaccuracies. Nothing in the podcast constitutes legal, accounting, or tax advice. The tax laws change frequently, and neither Tax Analysts Inc. nor the presenters, can guarantee that any information seen or heard is accurate. Also, due to changing tax laws, any information broadcast or downloaded after its original air date may no longer represent the current views of the presenters. If you have any specific questions about any legal or tax matter, you should always consult with your attorney or tax professional.

All content in this broadcast is protected under U.S. and international laws. Copyright © 2022 Tax Analysts Inc. Unauthorized recording, downloading, copying, retransmitting, or distributing of any part of the podcast is strictly prohibited. All rights reserved.

Copy RID