Menu
Tax Notes logo

Law Professors, Economists Support Filing Simplification Bill

APR. 18, 2016

Law Professors, Economists Support Filing Simplification Bill

DATED APR. 18, 2016
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Authors
    Bankman, Joseph
    Saez, Emmanuel
    Goolsbee, Austan
    Fleischer, Victor E.
    Lipman, Francine J.
    Aprill, Ellen P.
    Herzig, David
    Christians, Allison
    Buchanan, Neil H.
    Tahk, Susannah Camic
    Abreu, Alice
    Shaviro, Daniel
    Kleinbard, Edward D.
    Gamage, David
    Caron, Paul L.
    Strnad, Jeff
    Soled, Jay
    Beale, Linda M.
    Galle, Brian
    Marty-Nelson, Elena Maria
    Chodorow, Adam
    Ventry, Dennis
    Mills, David
    Lawsky, Sarah B.
    Leff, Benjamin
  • Institutional Authors
    Stanford Law School
    University of California, Berkeley
    University of Chicago Booth School of Business
    University of San Diego School of Law
    University of Nevada William S. Boyd School of Law
    Loyola Law School
    Valparaiso University Law School
    McGill Faculty of Law
    George Washington Law School
    University of Wisconsin Law School
    Temple Law
    NYU Law School
    USC Gould School of Law
    Berkeley Law
    Pepperdine University School of Law
    Stanford Law School
    Rutgers Business School
    Wayne Law
    Georgetown University Law Center
    Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad College of Law
    Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Conner College of Law
    UC Davis School of Law
    UC Irvine School of Law
    American University Washington College of Law
  • Cross-Reference
    S. 2789 2016 TNT 72-25: Proposed Legislation.
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2016-8245
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2016 TNT 76-40

 

April 18, 2016

 

 

Re: Support for the Tax Filing Simplification Act of 2016

 

1. We, the 54 undersigned law professors and economists, support the Tax Filing Simplification Act of 2016, introduced by Senator Warren to simplify tax filing for all American taxpayers.i

2. The United States has one of the most confusing and expensive tax filing systems of any nation. Americans spend billions of dollars a year in preparation fees. They spend millions of hours on record-keeping and filing.1

For many Americans, tax filing is anxiety-provoking, because taxpayers must interpret complex IRS forms and rules. Even taxpayers who seek help with their taxes must deal with the stress of finding the right preparer, choosing the best tax software, and saving slips of paper with confusing names, such as 1099-INT.

3. Faced with these difficulties, millions of lower- and middle-class Americans who have refunds coming simply don't file. Others file but fail to claim refunds and credits. Wealthier Americans file but incur unnecessary costs and burdens.2

4. Much of the time and expense involved in tax filing is unnecessary. The government already receives nearly all of the information it asks salaried taxpayers to provide. This includes wage, interest, dividends, and property and stock sales data. The Tax Filing Simplification Act allows taxpayers and their preparers to access this information. It further allows taxpayer to receive this data in the most usable form -- as entries on an electronic return in the taxpayer's chosen tax preparation software or in a pre-prepared return provided for free by the government. To make this possible, the bill requires that third-party-provided data is reported to the government in a timely fashion so that it can be made available to taxpayers in a timely fashion as well.

These provisions should substantially reduce record-keeping and filing costs. The provisions should also reduce post-filing adjustments and audits by reducing the number of mistakes taxpayers make when filling out forms.3

5. The Tax Filing Simplification Act allows taxpayers with simple returns to request a pro-forma return pre-populated with taxpayers' data, completed tax calculations, and the amount of taxes or refund due. Taxpayers can review that return and correct any errors. After review, they can sign and file the return. Pre-prepared returns are the norm in many countries, and have been successfully used in California.4 Under the bill, these returns are voluntary. These returns will substantially reduce tax filing costs for qualifying taxpayers.

6. The bill requires that the government make high quality tax-filing software available for free for all taxpayers. Taxes filed electronically (e-filed) using tax preparation software are easier to complete than paper returns, less susceptible to mathematical error, and used by all professional preparers.

The complexity of today's tax laws makes software-enabled filing a virtual requirement. Thirty years ago, no one would have supported a system in which paper returns and instruction booklets were available only for a fee paid to for-profit companies. Citizens relied on the IRS to provide them the forms they needed to file their returns. The Tax Simplification Act's requirement that the IRS provide that software to citizens who wish to use it is a much-needed improvement to our current system, in which taxpayers have limited options for e-filing taxes and must share data with private third parties in order to submit their tax returns electronically. The bill does not require that any taxpayers use government-supplied software.

7. The Tax Filing Simplification Act prohibits the IRS from entering into agreements with the tax preparation industry that limit its ability to provide tax software. In the past, agreements signed between the IRS and the software companies that are members of the Free File Alliance have given the tax preparation industry, which is dominated by one or two companies, exclusive control over tax filing. In return, the industry has agreed to provide "free filing" for low-income taxpayers. This has been a great bargain for industry, but a bad bargain for taxpayers.5 No citizen should have to pay for the software necessary to file taxes, nor should they be required to go through an industry middle-man to get their forms to the IRS.

8. The need for online security is addressed by provisions designed to ensure integrity of and security of the tax-filing system by requiring that these programs can only be accessed if an individual has verified his or her identity to the satisfaction of the Secretary of the Treasury.

Sincerely,

 

 

Joe Bankman,

 

Stanford Law School

 

 

Emmanuel Saez,

 

University of California, Berkeley

 

 

Austan Goolsbee,

 

University of Chicago Booth School

 

of Business

 

 

Victor Fleischer,

 

University of San Diego School of

 

Law

 

 

Francine Lipman,

 

William S. Boyd School of Law,

 

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

 

 

Ellen Aprill,

 

Loyola Law School, Los Angeles

 

 

David Herzig,

 

Valparaiso University Law School

 

 

Allison Christians,

 

McGill Faculty of Law

 

 

Neil Buchanan,

 

George Washington Law School

 

 

Susannah Camic Tahk,

 

University of Wisconsin Law School

 

 

Alice Abreu,

 

Temple Law

 

 

Daniel Shaviro,

 

NYU Law School

 

 

Edward Kleinbard,

 

USC Gould School of Law

 

 

David Gamage,

 

Berkeley Law

 

 

Paul Caron,

 

Pepperdine University School of Law

 

 

Jeff Strnad,

 

Stanford Law School

 

 

Jay Soled,

 

Rutgers Business School

 

 

Linda Beale,

 

Wayne Law

 

 

Brian Galle,

 

Georgetown University Law Center

 

 

Elena Maria Marty-Nelson,

 

Shepard Broad College of Law, Nova

 

Southeastern University

 

 

Adam Chodorow,

 

Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law,

 

Arizona State University

 

 

Dennis Ventry,

 

UC Davis School of Law

 

 

David Mills,

 

Stanford Law School

 

 

Sarah Lawsky,

 

UC Irvine School of Law

 

 

Benjamin Leff,

 

American University Washington

 

College of Law

 

 

Theodore Seto,

 

Loyola Law School, Los Angeles

 

 

Erin Scharff,

 

Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law,

 

Arizona State University

 

 

Kerry Ryan,

 

St. Louis University School of Law

 

 

Darien Shanske,

 

UC Davis School of Law

 

 

Barbara Fried,

 

Stanford Law School

 

 

Jonathan Forman,

 

University of Oklahoma College of

 

Law

 

 

Kathleen DeLaney Thomas,

 

UNC School of Law

 

 

John Brooks,

 

Georgetown University Law Center

 

 

Emily Satterthwaite,

 

University of Toronto Faculty of

 

Law

 

 

Yair Listokin,

 

Yale Law School

 

 

Katherine Pratt,

 

Loyola Law School, Los Angeles

 

 

Deborah Geier,

 

Cleveland-Marshall College of Law,

 

Cleveland State University

 

 

Jordan Barry,

 

University of San Diego School of

 

Law

 

 

Samuel Brunson,

 

Loyola University Chicago School of

 

Law

 

 

Ann Murphy,

 

Gonzaga University School of Law

 

 

Rob Nassau,

 

Syracuse University College of Law

 

 

Sonya Miller,

 

University of South Dakota School

 

of Law

 

 

Terri Morgeson,

 

Texas Tech University School of Law

 

 

Scott Schumacher,

 

University of Washington School of

 

Law

 

 

Michelle Drumbl,

 

Washington & Lee University School

 

of Law

 

 

Jan Pierce,

 

Lewis & Clark Law School

 

 

Grace Allison,

 

University of New Mexico School of

 

Law

 

 

George Willis,

 

Dale E. Fowler School of Law,

 

Chapman University

 

 

Eunkyong Choi,

 

Washington University of St. Louis

 

School of Law

 

 

Caroline Chen,

 

Santa Clara University School of

 

Law

 

 

Jennifer Gellner,

 

Gonzaga University School of Law

 

 

Elizabeth Sperow,

 

Orfalea College of Business,

 

California Polytechnic State

 

University

 

 

Lisa Milot

 

University of Georgia School of Law

 

 

Keith Fogg

 

Harvard Law School

 

FOOTNOTES

 

 

i The undersigned are giving their institutional affiliation for identification purposes only; they are signing only in their individual capacities.

1 Austan Goolsbee, The 'Simple Return': Reducing America's Tax Burden Through Return-Free Filing, Discussion Paper 2006-04, The Brookings Institution (July 2006) (online at http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Research/Files/Papers/2006/7/useconomics-goolsbee/200607goolsbee.PDF).

2 For example, the IRS recently announced that it had over $950 million in unclaimed 2012 refunds. Internal Revenue Service, "IRS Has Refunds Totaling $950 Million for People Who Have Not Filed a 2012 Federal Income Tax Return" (March 10, 2016) (online at https://www.irs.gov/uac/Newsroom/IRS-Has-Refunds-Totaling-950-Million-dollars-for-People-Who-Have-Not-Filed-a-2012-Federal-Income-Tax-Return).

3 In California, a pilot program offering taxpayers pre-prepared returns saw error rates as low as 0.5%. See California Franchise Tax Board, ReadyReturn Pilot -- Tax Year 2004 -- Study Results (April 20, 2006) (online at https://www.ftb.ca.gov/readyReturn/TY04RRFinalReport.pdf).

4 Joseph Bankman, "Simple Filing for Average Citizens: The California Ready Return," Tax Notes (June 13, 2005): 1431-1434 (online at http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/files/2005-11952-1.pdf).

5 For more information on how the existing Free File Program sells taxpayers short, see Laura Saunders, "Why 'Free File' for Taxes Isn't So Popular: Here's How to Navigate the Maze of Offerings and Avoid Charges," Wall Street Journal (January 30, 2014) (online at http://www.wsj.com/articles/why-free-file-for-taxes-isnt-so-popular-1422633546).

 

END OF FOOTNOTES
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Authors
    Bankman, Joseph
    Saez, Emmanuel
    Goolsbee, Austan
    Fleischer, Victor E.
    Lipman, Francine J.
    Aprill, Ellen P.
    Herzig, David
    Christians, Allison
    Buchanan, Neil H.
    Tahk, Susannah Camic
    Abreu, Alice
    Shaviro, Daniel
    Kleinbard, Edward D.
    Gamage, David
    Caron, Paul L.
    Strnad, Jeff
    Soled, Jay
    Beale, Linda M.
    Galle, Brian
    Marty-Nelson, Elena Maria
    Chodorow, Adam
    Ventry, Dennis
    Mills, David
    Lawsky, Sarah B.
    Leff, Benjamin
  • Institutional Authors
    Stanford Law School
    University of California, Berkeley
    University of Chicago Booth School of Business
    University of San Diego School of Law
    University of Nevada William S. Boyd School of Law
    Loyola Law School
    Valparaiso University Law School
    McGill Faculty of Law
    George Washington Law School
    University of Wisconsin Law School
    Temple Law
    NYU Law School
    USC Gould School of Law
    Berkeley Law
    Pepperdine University School of Law
    Stanford Law School
    Rutgers Business School
    Wayne Law
    Georgetown University Law Center
    Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad College of Law
    Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Conner College of Law
    UC Davis School of Law
    UC Irvine School of Law
    American University Washington College of Law
  • Cross-Reference
    S. 2789 2016 TNT 72-25: Proposed Legislation.
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2016-8245
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2016 TNT 76-40
Copy RID