Menu
Tax Notes logo

STOCK ACQUISITION FOLLOWED BY PLANNED LIQUIDATION OF SUBSIDIARY IS NOT TAX FREE REORG.

MAR. 16, 1951

Kimbell-Diamond Milling Co. v. Comm.

DATED MAR. 16, 1951
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    KIMBELL-DIAMOND MILLING CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
  • Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  • Docket
    No. 13,307
  • Judge
    Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
  • Cross-Reference
    Kimbell-Diamond Milling Co. v. Commissioner, 187 F.2d 718 (5th Cir.

    1951)
  • Parallel Citation
    187 F.2d 718
    51-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9201
    40 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 328
    1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3966
    1951 P.H. P72,298
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    liquidations, subsidiary
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    1995 TNT 38-200
    1951 LEX 95-36

Kimbell-Diamond Milling Co. v. Comm.

            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

 

                            March 16, 1951

 

 

     Rehearing Denied April 23, 1951.

 

 

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The correctness vel non of the challenged deficiencies, determined by the commissioner and approved and adopted by the Tax Court, turns on whether the taxpayer petitioner is right in insisting that assets acquired by it by first purchasing the stock of, and then liquidating, Whaley Company should be included in petitioner's basis at their cost to Whaley or whether the commissioner is right in insisting that they should be included at the cost to petitioner of Whaley's stock.

The facts are fully reported and the law of the case is correctly and adequately set forth in the opinion and decision of the Tax Court. 1 It will, therefore, serve no useful purpose for us to again set down the facts and again canvass and state the controlling findings and conclusions which determined there and determine here what the decision should be. It will be sufficient for us to say that we are in full agreement with the findings and conclusions of the Tax Court and with the reasoning on which they are based.

So agreeing, in spite of petitioner's earnest and vigorous attack upon them by brief and oral argument, we deny the petition for review and affirm the attacked order for the reasons and upon the considerations advanced by the Tax Court.

Affirmed.

 

FOOTNOTE TO OPINION

 

 

1 Kimbell-Diamond Milling Co. v. Commissioner, 14 T.C. 74.

 

END OF FOOTNOTE TO OPINION
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    KIMBELL-DIAMOND MILLING CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
  • Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  • Docket
    No. 13,307
  • Judge
    Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
  • Cross-Reference
    Kimbell-Diamond Milling Co. v. Commissioner, 187 F.2d 718 (5th Cir.

    1951)
  • Parallel Citation
    187 F.2d 718
    51-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9201
    40 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 328
    1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3966
    1951 P.H. P72,298
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    liquidations, subsidiary
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    1995 TNT 38-200
    1951 LEX 95-36
Copy RID