Menu
Tax Notes logo

Eighth Circuit Affirms Tax Court Decision in CDP Case, Dismissals

MAR. 11, 2016

Witdfeldt, James A., et al. v. Comm.

DATED MAR. 11, 2016
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    JAMES A. WIDTFELDT Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent ESTATE OF GUSTEVA WIDTFELDT, DECEASED, JAMES A. WIDTFELDT, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Appellee ESTATE OF GUSTEVA E. WIDTFELDT, DECEASED, JAMES WIDTFELDT, STATUTORY EXECUTOR Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE Respondent
  • Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
  • Docket
    Nos. 14-2382, 14-2444, 15-2166
  • Judge
    Per curiam
  • Parallel Citation
    641 Fed. Appx. 637
    2016-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P60,692
    117 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2016-968
    2016 WL 929357
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2016-5277
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2016 TNT 49-17

Witdfeldt, James A., et al. v. Comm.

 

[Unpublished]

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

 

 

Appeals from the United States Tax Court

 

 

Submitted: March 7, 2016

 

Filed: March 11, 2016

 

 

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals -- two of which arise from actions that were dismissed as duplicating the first action -- James Widtfeldt appeals the tax court's grant of summary judgment to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in a collection due process case. Following careful de novo review, we agree with the Commissioner that Widtfeldt was not entitled to re-litigate the tax liability of his deceased mother's estate, and Widtfeldt has identified no basis for reversal. See 26 U.S.C. § 6330; Nestle Purina Petcare Co. v. Comm'r, 594 F.3d 968, 970 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of tax court's grant of summary judgment); Widtfeldt v. Comm'r, 449 Fed. Appx. 561 (8th Cir. Jan. 9, 2012) (unpublished per curiam). We also conclude that the tax court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the duplicate actions. The rulings of the tax court are affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and the Commissioner's motion is denied as moot.

DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    JAMES A. WIDTFELDT Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent ESTATE OF GUSTEVA WIDTFELDT, DECEASED, JAMES A. WIDTFELDT, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Appellee ESTATE OF GUSTEVA E. WIDTFELDT, DECEASED, JAMES WIDTFELDT, STATUTORY EXECUTOR Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE Respondent
  • Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
  • Docket
    Nos. 14-2382, 14-2444, 15-2166
  • Judge
    Per curiam
  • Parallel Citation
    641 Fed. Appx. 637
    2016-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P60,692
    117 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2016-968
    2016 WL 929357
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Area/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2016-5277
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2016 TNT 49-17
Copy RID