Impact Payments Need Protection, Banking Groups Say
Impact Payments Need Protection, Banking Groups Say
- Institutional AuthorsAmerican Bankers AssociationAmericans for Financial ReformBank Policy InstituteConsumer ActionConsumer Bankers AssociationCommunity Development Bankers AssociationConsumer Federation of AmericaConsumer ReportsCredit Union National AssociationIndependent Community Bankers of AmericaNational Automated Clearing House AssociationNational Association of Consumer AdvocatesNational Association of Federally-Insured Credit UnionsNational Bankers AssociationNational Consumer Law CenterPublic CitizenClearing HouseU.S. Public Interest Research GroupCenter for Responsible Lending
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Industry GroupsBanking, brokerage services, and related financial services
- Jurisdictions
- Tax Analysts Document Number2021-10131
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2021 TNTF 46-26
March 8, 2021
The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Speaker of the House
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
The Honorable Mitch McConnell
Minority Leader
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
The Honorable Chuck Schumer
Majority Leader
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
The Honorable Kevin McCarthy
Minority Leader
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
Re: Immediate action need to protect economic impact payments from assignment or garnishment
Dear Speaker Pelosi, Majority Leader Schumer, Minority Leader McCarthy and Minority Leader McConnell:
The undersigned consumer and banking industry organizations again write to urge Congress to protect the third round of economic impact payments in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 from assignment and garnishment. The attached language mirrors the language in the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021 that applied to the second round of economic impact payments and should be passed as a standalone bill. Our organizations have worked together to address this issue, and we strongly support adoption of such a bill.
The second economic impact payments paid pursuant to the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021 were exempt from garnishment. In addition, prior to passage of that statute, in July 2020, the Senate unanimously approved S.3841 (Grassley/Wyden), which would have protected the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act or CARES Act 2020 from assignment and garnishment.
However, this third round is not exempt, a result we understand was due to limits associated with the budget reconciliation process and application of the Byrd rule. Unless this issue is addressed, the second and third EIPs will be treated inconsistently — those in the second round exempt but those in the third round not exempt.
The economic impact payments are intended to help families purchase food and other necessities to make ends meet. Many people were already struggling prior to the coronavirus crisis and millions have now been laid off or had their hours cut. As explained in our February 23, 2021 letter, allowing economic impact payments to be garnished could impose significant burdens on some families, especially those in communities of color, facing unprecedented circumstances.
While depository institutions and even many debt collectors and buyers believe that economic impact payments should be exempt from garnishment orders, depository institutions are obligated to comply with court orders, and unless Congress immediately passes the attached language in a standalone bill, they will be forced to pay some creditors who attempt to garnish and freeze bank accounts.
We believe it is imperative that Congress ensure that these next stimulus payments are treated as “benefits” subject to the federal exemption from garnishment. Otherwise, the families that most need this money — those struggling with debt and whose entire bank accounts may be frozen by garnishment orders — will be not be able to access their funds. This group includes very low-income families with children, people who have been disconnected from work opportunities for a long period, and many low-income adults now raising children in their homes.
For these reasons, we urge Congress to quickly pass standalone legislation addressing garnishment to ensure that American families will receive these benefits as intended to fulfill our common goal of protecting these payments from garnishment within the practical realities of existing financial institution systems.
Thank you for your efforts to protect American families during this emergency.
Sincerely,
American Bankers Association
Americans for Financial Reform
Bank Policy Institute
Center for Responsible Lending
Consumer Action
Consumer Bankers Association
Community Development Bankers Association
Consumer Federation of America
Consumer Reports
Credit Union National Association
Independent Community Bankers of America
Nacha
National Association of Consumer Advocates
National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions
National Bankers Association
National Consumer Law Center (on behalf of its low income clients)
Public Citizen
The Clearing House
U.S. PIRG
cc:
Members of the U.S. House of Representatives
Members of the United States Senate
- Institutional AuthorsAmerican Bankers AssociationAmericans for Financial ReformBank Policy InstituteConsumer ActionConsumer Bankers AssociationCommunity Development Bankers AssociationConsumer Federation of AmericaConsumer ReportsCredit Union National AssociationIndependent Community Bankers of AmericaNational Automated Clearing House AssociationNational Association of Consumer AdvocatesNational Association of Federally-Insured Credit UnionsNational Bankers AssociationNational Consumer Law CenterPublic CitizenClearing HouseU.S. Public Interest Research GroupCenter for Responsible Lending
- Subject Area/Tax Topics
- Industry GroupsBanking, brokerage services, and related financial services
- Jurisdictions
- Tax Analysts Document Number2021-10131
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2021 TNTF 46-26