Menu
Tax Notes logo

Rev. Proc. 84-27

APR. 2, 1984

Rev. Proc. 84-27; 1984-1 C.B. 469

DATED APR. 2, 1984
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Cross-Reference

    26 CFR 601.204: Changes in accounting periods and methods of

    accounting.

    (Also Part I, Sections 163, 446, 451, 461, 481, 1381; 1.163-1,

    1.446-1, 1.451-1, 1.461-1, 1.481-1, 1.1381-1.)

  • Code Sections
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    not available
Citations: Rev. Proc. 84-27; 1984-1 C.B. 469

Obsoleted by Rev. Proc. 97-37

Rev. Proc. 84-27

SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The purpose of this revenue procedure is to provide a mandatory procedure for taxpayers to change their method of accounting for interest on indebtedness when they have been reporting interest income or deductions in accordance with the Rule of 78's computation.

This revenue procedure applies to lenders and borrowers who report interest income or who claim interest deductions with respect to loans using the Rule of 78's method, other than for consumer loans coming within the administrative exception in Rev. Proc. 83-40, 1983-1 C.B. 774, and other than for loans covered by the procedures set forth in Rev. Proc. 84-28. Rev. Proc. 84-28 sets forth a mandatory procedure for changing the method with respect to loans for which the interest computed under the Rule of 78's exceeds the loan payments during any year of the term of the loan. For consumer loans described in Rev. Proc. 83-40, the change is not mandatory. However, taxpayers proposing to change their method for such loans for any tax year must do so by complying with the provisions of Rev. Proc. 84-30.

SEC. 2. BACKGROUND

.01 The Rule of 78's is described in Rev. Rul. 83-84, 1983-1 C.B. 97, as a method of allocating interest on a loan among time periods during the term of the loan. Under this method, the amount of interest allocable to each period is determined by multiplying the total interest payable over the life of the indebtedness by a fraction, (a) the numerator of which is the number of periods remaining on such indebtedness at the time the calculation is made and (b) the denominator of which is the sum of the periods' digits for the term of the indebtedness.

.02 Rev.Rul. 83-84 indicates that the Rule of 78's represents a purely mechanical formula for allocating interest among periods. Because interest is earned by the lender by application of the effective rate of interest over the term of the loan, any agreement between a borrower and a lender that provides that interest is earned in another manner, such as under the Rule of 78's computation, lacks economic substance since it fails to reflect the true cost of borrowing. Rev.Rul. 83-84 indicates further that no tax effect will be given to the Rule of 78's provision.

.03 Rev.Rul. 83-84 states that an agreement between a borrower and a lender with respect to any one year of a loan is not independent of the agreement with respect to any other year of the loan. In general, the substance of a loan agreement is that the same rate of interest applies to each tax year of the loan, regardless of any contrary formulas that may be stated in the agreement. The amount of interest attributable to the use of money for each period between payments is determined by applying the "effective rate of interest" on the loan to the "unpaid balance" of the loan for that period. The unpaid balance of a loan is the amount borrowed plus interest earned minus amounts paid. The effective rate of interest is a measure of the cost of credit, expressed as a yearly rate, that relates the amount and timing of values received to the amount and timing of payments made, and is thus a reflection of the cost of the amount borrowed for the time it is actually available. See Conf.Rep. No. 97-760, 97th Cong., 2d Sess. 553 (1982), 1982-2 C.B. 600, 639; S.Rep. No. 97-494 (Vol. 1), 97th Cong., 2d Sess. 209 (1982); Supplement I to Regulation Z issued by the Federal Reserve System, 12 CFR Sections 226.6 and 226.40 (1979). Therefore, the effective rate of interest, which is a uniform rate over the term of the loan and is based on the amount of the loan and the repayment schedule provided in the loan agreement, when applied to the unpaid balance of the indebtedness for a given period, will produce the true cost of that indebtedness for that period. This true cost of borrowing is sometimes referred to as the economic accrual of interest. (For purposes of this revenue procedure, the economic accrual of interest is hereinafter referred to as the "prescribed method.")

.04 Rev. Proc. 83-40 states that in a typical short-term consumer loan transaction, the Internal Revenue Service will accept the Rule of 78's method for computing the borrower's interest deduction and the lender's interest income as a matter of administrative convenience. The administrative exception for short-term consumer loans applies only when there is a self-amortizing loan that requires level payments, at regular intervals at least annually, over a period not in excess of five years (with no balloon payment at the end of the loan term), and when the loan agreement between the borrower and the lender provides that interest is earned, or upon the prepayment of the loan interest is treated as earned, in accordance with the Rule of 78's method. As indicated above under "PURPOSE AND SCOPE", any change in method of accounting regarding loans described in Rev. Proc. 83-40 is not a mandatory change. However, taxpayers proposing to change their method for such loans must do so by complying with the provisions of Rev. Proc. 84-30.

.05 Section 446(e) of the Internal Revenue Code and section 1.446-1(e) of the Income Tax Regulations provide that in order to change a method of accounting for federal income tax purposes the taxpayer must obtain the consent of the Commissioner. Section 1.446-1(e)(3)(i) requires that in order to obtain such consent an application must be filed within 180 days after the beginning of the tax year in which the taxpayer desires to make the change. Section 1.446-1(e)(3)(ii) authorizes the Commissioner to prescribe administrative procedures setting forth the limitations, terms, and conditions deemed necessary to permit a taxpayer to obtain consent to a change in its method of accounting in accordance with section 446(e).

.06 Section 481(a) of the Code requires that those adjustments necessary to prevent amounts from being duplicated or omitted be taken into account when the taxpayer's income is computed under a method of accounting different from the method used to compute taxable income for the preceding tax year. Section 481(c) and section 1.481-5 of the regulations provide that the adjustment required by section 481(a) may be taken into account in determining taxable income in the manner and subject to the conditions agreed to by the Commissioner and the taxpayer.

SEC. 3. APPLICATION

.01 Consent. In accordance with section 1.446-1(e)(3)(ii) of the regulations, the 180-day rule is waived and under section 1.446-1(e)(2)(i) consent is hereby granted to taxpayers to change a method of accounting with respect to interest on indebtedness from the method of computing interest income and deductions using the Rule of 78's method to the "prescribed method." See section 2.03 above. Such consent is granted for the first or second tax year ending on or after December 31, 1983, and the change shall be made in accordance with the provisions of this revenue procedure, including the adjustment under section 481(a) of the Code described in section 3.03 below.

.02 Year for change. Pursuant to the consent granted in section 3.01, both the lender and borrower to whom this revenue procedure applies and who are using the Rule of 78's method of accounting for computing interest income and deductions must change such method of accounting to the "prescribed method" on their federal income tax returns. The taxpayer has the choice of making the change on the federal income tax return filed for either the first or second tax year ending on or after December 31, 1983.

.03 Section 481(a) adjustment. An adjustment is required to prevent amounts of income and deduction from being duplicated within the meaning of section 481 of the Code and the regulations thereunder when the change in method of accounting is made pursuant to the provisions set forth in this revenue procedure. Such adjustment, whether positive or negative, referred to as the "section 481(a) adjustment," shall be taken into account in computing taxable income and in computing corporate earnings and profits. As to taxable income, the adjustment is made in the manner provided in sections 3.04-3.07 below. As to corporate earnings and profits, the adjustment is made in the manner provided in Rev. Proc. 79-49, 1979-2 C.B. 528. The change in method of accounting shall be considered to be a change in method of accounting initiated by the taxpayer.

.04 Period for positive section 481(a) adjustment.

1 When the section 481(a) adjustment results in an increase in taxable income and the change to the "prescribed method" is made in accordance with section 3.02, the period for taking into account the section 481(a) adjustment referred to in section 3.03 (adjustment period) is generally to be determined as follows:

(a) When the entire amount of the section 481(a) adjustment is attributable to the tax year immediately preceding the year of change (first preceding year), the total adjustment is to be taken into account in computing taxable income for the year of change. The amount attributable to the tax year immediately preceding the year of change is the difference in the amount of the adjustment determined under section 481(a) of the Code for the year of change and the amount that would have been required under section 481(a) if the change to the "prescribed method" had been made in the preceding year.

(b) When (a) above does not apply and 67 percent or more of the amount of the section 481(a) adjustment is attributable to the 1-tax year period, 2-tax year period, or 3-tax year period immediately preceding the year of change, the highest percent attributable to the 1, 2, or 3-tax year period will be taken into account ratably over a 3-tax year period beginning with the year of change. Any remaining balance will be taken into account ratably over an additional period equal to the remainder of the number of tax years the taxpayer has continuously used the Rule of 78's method. However, the total adjustment period shall not exceed six tax years. This subparagraph, 3.04-1(b), only applies if the taxpayer has used the Rule of 78's method for more than three tax years. If the Rule of 78's method has been used for no more than four tax years, 75 percent shall be substituted for 67 percent. An amount attributable to the 1, 2, or 3-tax year period is the difference in the amount of the adjustment determined under section 481(a) of the Code for the year of change and the amount that would have been required under section 481(a) if the change to the "prescribed method" had been made at the beginning of the preceding 1, 2, or 3-tax year period.

(c) In all other situations in which (a) and (b) above do not apply, the section 481(a) adjustment will be taken into account ratably over the number of years (not to exceed six) the taxpayer has continuously used the Rule of 78's method.

2 In applying sections 3.04-1(a) or (b), if a taxpayer's books and records do not contain sufficient information to compute the section 481(a) adjustment attributable to the 1, 2, or 3-tax year period immediately preceding the year of change, the taxpayer may reasonably estimate the amount and attach and sign (or have signed by an officer who has personal knowledge of the facts) the following statement to the Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method:

Under penalty of perjury, I hereby certify that:

(a) the books and records of (name of the taxpayer) do not contain sufficient information to permit a computation of the section 481(a) adjustment attributable to the 1-tax year period, 2-tax year period, or 3-tax year period immediately preceding the year of change as required by section 3.04-1(b) of Rev. Proc. 84-27.

(b) Based on the information that is contained in the records, to the best of my information and belief, the entire amount of the section 481(a) adjustment for the year of change (indicate "is" or "is not," as the case may be) attributable to the tax year immediately preceding the year of change, and 67 percent (or 75 percent in applicable cases) or more of the section 481(a) adjustment for the year of change (indicate "is" or "is not," as the case may be) attributable to the 1-tax year period, 2-tax year period, or 3-tax year period immediately preceding the year of change.

3 A cooperative within the meaning of section 1381(a) of the Code shall take the total amount of the section 481(a) adjustment into account in computing taxable income for the year of change.

.05 Change in subsequent year for positive section 481(a) adjustment. If the taxpayer fails to change to the "prescribed method" in accordance with the consent granted in section 3.01 of this revenue procedure, consent is hereby granted to taxpayers to change to the "prescribed method" for tax years subsequent to the required tax years set forth in section 3.02. The change must be made on the taxpayer's timely filed federal income tax return for such subsequent year. The section 481(a) adjustment will be taken into account ratably over the number of years the taxpayer has continuously used the Rule of 78's method, not to exceed three tax years.

.06 Period for negative section 481(a) adjustment.

1 When the section 481(a) adjustment results in a decrease in taxable income and the change to the "prescribed method" is made in accordance with section 3.02, the period for taking into account the section 481(a) adjustment referred to in section 3.03 (adjustment period) is generally to be determined as follows:

(a) When the entire amount of the section 481(a) adjustment is attributable to the tax year immediately preceding the year of of change (first preceding year), the total adjustment is to be taken into account in computing taxable income for the year of change. The amount attributable to the tax year immediately preceding the year of change is the difference in the amount of the adjustment determined under section 481(a) of the Code for the year of change and the amount that would have been required under section 481(a) if the change to the "prescribed method" had been made in the preceding year.

(b) In all other situations, the section 481(a) adjustment will be taken into account ratably over the number of years (not to exceed three) the taxpayer has continuously used the Rule of 78's method.

2 A cooperative within the meaning of section 1381(a) of the Code shall take the total amount of the section 481(a) adjustment into account in computing taxable income for the year of change.

.07 Change in subsequent year for negative section 481(a) adjustment. If the taxpayer fails to change to the "prescribed method" in accordance with the consent granted in section 3.01 of this revenue procedure, consent is hereby granted to taxpayers to change to the "prescribed method" for tax years subsequent to the required tax years set forth in section 3.02. The change must be made on the taxpayer's timely filed federal income tax return for such subsequent year. The section 481(a) adjustment will be taken into account ratably over the number of years the taxpayer has continuously used the Rule of 78's method, not to exceed six tax years.

.08 Net Operating Loss Carryovers and Net Operating Losses.

1 No part of any (consolidated or separate) net operating loss carryover (NOL carryover) available at the beginning of the year of change may be used as an offset against the portion of the positive section 481(a) adjustment taken into account in the year of change. This condition will not apply to tax years subsequent to the year of change.

2 Any portion of any net operating loss arising in the year of change or in any subsequent year in the adjustment period that is attributable to the negative section 481(a) adjustment may not be carried to those 3 tax years preceding the year of change, to which section 172 of the Code otherwise would require it first to be carried.

.09 Investment credit or any other credits. No part of any (consolidated or separate) investment credit carryover or any other credit carryover available at the beginning of the year of change may be used to reduce the federal income tax liability resulting from, or attributable to, the inclusion in income of a portion of the section 481(a) adjustment in the year of change. This restriction does not apply, however, to a credit arising in the year of change.

.10 Ceasing to engage in the trade or business.

(a) With respect to a corporation:

If a corporate taxpayer ceases to engage in the trade or business to which the section 481(a) adjustment (section 3.03) relates at any time prior to the expiration of the adjustment period, the taxpayer shall take into account in that year the balance of the adjustment not previously taken into account in computing taxable income. See Rev. Rul. 80-39, 1980-1 C.B. 112, which holds that if a division of a corporation, for which a change in method of accounting had been granted, ceases to operate the trade or business for which the change in method was granted, the remaining section 481(a) adjustment applicable to the business conducted by that division of the corporation must be taken into account in the year the corporation ceases to engage in that trade or business. For purposes of this condition, the taxpayer is not considered to have ceased the trade or business if the cessation is the result of a transaction to which section 381 of the Code applies, but in that case the acquiring corporation shall continue to be subject to this revenue procedure as though it were the acquired corporation.

(b) With respect to a partnership:

In the event a partnership terminates or ceases to engage in the trade or business (within the meaning of section 708 of the Code) to which the section 481(a) adjustment (section 3.03) relates at any time prior to the expiration of the adjustment period, the balance of the section 481(a) adjustment not previously taken into account in computing the partnership's income or deductions shall be taken into account in the year of cessation. A partnership ceasing to engage in the trade or business includes the incorporation of the trade or business in a transaction to which section 351 applies (see Rev. Rul. 77-264, 1977-2 C.B. 187).

(c) With respect to a sole proprietor:

If a sole proprietor ceases to engage in the trade or business to which the section 481(a) adjustment (section 3.03) relates at any time prior to the expiration of the adjustment period, the balance of the adjustment not previously taken into account in computing taxable income shall be taken into account in the year of cessation. A sole proprietor ceasing to engage in the trade of business includes the incorporation of such trade or business in a transaction to which section 351 of the Code applies (see Rev. Rul. 77-264). A sole proprietorship does not cease to engage in that trade or business when the individual taxpayer sells a partial interest in the proprietorship and continues to be actively engaged in the management of the business that is subsequently operated as a partnership. The section 481(a) adjustment remaining at the time the partnership is formed is taken into account by the partnership as though there had been no change in ownership (see Rev. Rul. 66-206, 1966-2 C.B. 206).

SEC. 4. RECORDS

Taxpayers must maintain adequate records so that the Service may, upon examination, verify the data concerning the change in method of accounting.

SEC. 5. COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS

Taxpayers making a change from the Rule of 78's method to the "prescribed method" without complying with all the conditions of this revenue procedure will be deemed to have made the change without obtaining the consent of the Commissioner.

SEC. 6. MANNER OF EFFECTING CHANGE

.01 Taxpayers to which this revenue procedure applies must effect the change in their methods of accounting for either their first or second tax year ending on or after December 31, 1983, pursuant to the provisions set forth in this revenue procedure by filing a current Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method, in duplicate. The original of the Form 3115 shall be attached to the taxpayer's timely filed federal income tax return. However, if the taxpayer chooses to make the change for the first tax year ending on or after December 31, 1983, the taxpayer may make the change on an amended return for such year filed no later than the extended time prescribed in section 6081 of the Code and regulations thereunder whether or not the taxpayer has, in fact, been granted an extension of time for filing its income tax return for such year. For example, a domestic corporation, whose tax year ends on December 31st, may effect the change described in this revenue procedure on the original timely filed return for either 1983 or 1984, or on an amended return for the 1983 tax year filed no later than September 15, 1984. Similarly, an individual, whose tax year ends on December 31st, may effect the change described in this revenue procedure on the original timely filed return for either 1983 or 1984, or on an amended return for the 1983 tax year filed no later than August 15, 1984. At the time the original of the Form 3115 is filed with the federal income tax return, a copy of the Form 3115 shall be filed with the National Office addressed to the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Attention: CC:C:C:1, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20224. In addition to the information required on Form 3115, the taxpayer must provide (1) a computation of the section 481(a) adjustment and (2) the period over which the section 481(a) adjustment will be taken into account and the basis for such conclusion. The National Office will sample the Form 3115's to determine whether the requirements of this revenue procedure have been followed. The National Office or the District Director may advise the taxpayer of required adjustments to the change in method of accounting for interest income and deductions.

.02 Taxpayers described in section 3.05 or section 3.07 must also follow the procedures set forth in section 6.01 regarding the place for filing of the original and the copy of the Form 3115 with respect to the tax year for which the change to the "prescribed method" is made. Such taxpayers must also furnish with the Form 3115 the additional information set forth in section 6.01 above regarding the section 481(a) adjustment and its adjustment period.

.03 In order to assist in the processing of these changes in method of accounting and to ensure proper handling, reference to this revenue procedure shall be made a part of the Form 3115 by either typing or legibly printing the following statement at the top of Page 1 of Form 3115: "FILED UNDER REV.PROC. 84-27".

SEC. 7. EXAMPLES

Example A

A taxpayer, that uses the accrual method of accounting and reports its income on a calendar year basis, borrowed $100,000 on January 1, 1980, payable in 10 annual installments of $17,698 each. The total interest on the loan will be $76,980 (10 x $17,698 = $176,980; $176,980 $100,000 = $76,980). The terms of the loan state that interest is earned by the lender in accordance with the Rule of 78's computation, and beginning in 1980 the taxpayer computed its annual interest deduction using the Rule of 78's. The effective rate of interest is 12 percent. Commencing with 1980 and continuing through 1983, the taxpayer used the Rule of 78's method for computing interest deductions and deducted a total of $47,587 in interest during those four years. If the taxpayer had used the "prescribed method" for computing its deductions for interest during those four years, the total interest deduction would have been $43,558. The difference in the interest deduction using the two methods is $4,029. The following table shows the interest computed under the two methods for the first four years.

                                Table

 

                    Economic accrual of interest

 

 Years                   (Prescribed Method)              Rule of 78's

 

 1980                           12,000                       13,996

 

 1981                           11,316                       12,597

 

 1982                           10,550                       11,197

 

 1983                            9,692                        9,797

 

 

The taxpayer chose to make the change to the "prescribed method" on its tax return for 1984, rather than the return for 1983. Therefore, with the taxpayer's timely filed federal income tax return for the fifth year (1984), the taxpayer filed a Form 3115 in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 3 and 6.01 of this revenue procedure. By changing to the "prescribed method" commencing with the fifth year of the loan and continuing to use that method, the taxpayer will eventually receive a double deduction for interest in the amount of $4,029. Thus, under section 481(a) of the Code, an adjustment is necessary solely by reason of the change in method of accounting in order to prevent the $4,029 from being duplicated, i.e., taken again as a deduction. If the taxpayer had made the change to the "prescribed method" for the tax years 1981, 1982, or 1983, the amount of the adjustment would have been $1,996, $3,277, or $3,924, respectively. The percent of the section 481(a) adjustment attributable to the 1, 2 or 3-tax year period preceding the year of change is determined as follows:

                          1-tax year period

 

 Adjustment as of January 1, 1984                             $4,029

 

 Less: hypothetical adjustment as

 

 of January 1, 1983                                            3,924

 

                                                             --------

 

 Amount attributable to 1-tax year period                     $  105

 

                                                             ========

 

 Percent of adjustment

 

 attributable to 1-tax year                          105

 

                                                  -------

 

 period:                                           4,029      = 2.6%

 

 

                          2-tax year period

 

 Adjustment as of January 1, 1984                             $4,029

 

 Less: hypothetical adjustment as

 

 of January 1, 1982                                            3,277

 

                                                             --------

 

 Amount attributable to 2-tax year period                     $  752

 

                                                             ========

 

 Percent of adjustment

 

 attributable to 2-tax year                          752

 

                                                  -------

 

 period:                                           4,029      = 18.7%

 

 

                          3-tax year period

 

 Adjustment as of January 1, 1984                             $4,029

 

 Less: Hypothetical adjustment as

 

 of January 1, 1981                                            1,996

 

                                                             --------

 

 Amount attributable to 3-tax year period                     $2,033

 

                                                             =======

 

 Percent of adjustment

 

 attributable to 3-tax year                         2,033

 

                                                   ------

 

 period:                                            4,029     = 50.5%

 

 

Because less than 75 percent of the adjustment is attributable to the 1983, the 1982, and the 1981 tax years, section 3.04-1(c) of this revenue procedure requires that an adjustment under section 481(a) in the amount of $4,029 be taken into account as an item of gross income ratably over four tax years, the number of tax years that the taxpayer has used the Rule of 78's method.

Example B

The facts are the same as in Example A except that the taxpayer entered into three loans each for $100,000 with identical terms to the loan described in Example A. The first loan was entered into on January 1, 1979, and the other two loans were entered into on January 1, 1981. The following table shows the interest computed using the "prescribed method" and using the Rule of 78's method for the five years that the taxpayer computed its annual interest deduction using the Rule of 78's method.

                               Table

 

            Economic accrual of

 

 Year   interest (Prescribed Method)              Rule of 78's

 

                   2nd & 3rd                       2nd & 3rd

 

        1st loan    loans       Total    1st loan    loans       Total

 

 1979    12,000                12,000     13,966                13,966

 

 1980    11,316                11,316     12,597                12,597

 

 1981    10,550     24,000     34,550     11,197     27,932     39,129

 

 1982     9,692     22,632     32,324      9,797     25,194     34,991

 

 1983     8,731     21,100     29,831      8,398     22,394     30,792

 

 

During the five years the taxpayer deducted a total of $131,475 in interest based on the Rule of 78's method. If the taxpayer has used the "prescribed method" for computing its deductions for interest during those five years, the total interest deduction would have been $120,021. The difference in the interest deduction using the two methods is $11,454.

With the taxpayer's timely filed federal income tax return for the sixth year (1984), the taxpayer filed a Form 3115 in accordance with the provisions set forth of section 3 and 6.01 of this revenue procedure. By changing to the prescribed method commencing with the sixth year and continuing to use that method, the taxpayer will eventually receive a double deduction for interest in the amount of $11,454. Thus, under section 481(a) of the Code, an adjustment is necessary solely by reason of the change in method of accounting in order to prevent the $11,454 from being duplicated, i.e., taken again as a deduction. If the taxpayer had made the change to the "prescribed method" for the tax year 1981, 1982, or 1983, the amount of the adjustment would have been $3,247, $7,826, or $10,493, respectively. The percent of the section 481(a) adjustment attributable to the 1, 2, or 3-tax year period preceding the year of change is determined as follows:

                          1-tax year period

 

 Adjustment as of January 1, 1984                            $11,454

 

 Less: hypothetical adjustment as

 

 of January 1, 1983                                           10,493

 

                                                             --------

 

 Amount attributable to 1-tax year period                    $   961

 

                                                             ========

 

 Percent of adjustment

 

 attributable to 1-tax year                          961

 

                                                  -------

 

 period:                                          11,454      = 8.4%

 

 

                          2-tax year period

 

 Adjustment as of January 1, 1984                            $11,454

 

 Less: hypothetical adjustment as

 

 of January 1, 1982                                            7,826

 

                                                             --------

 

 Amount attributable to 2-tax year period                    $ 3,628

 

                                                             ========

 

 Percent of adjustment

 

 attributable to 2-tax year                        3,628

 

                                                  -------

 

 period:                                          11,454      = 31.7%

 

 

                          3-tax year period

 

 Adjustment as of January 1, 1984                            $11,454

 

 Less: Hypothetical adjustment as

 

 of January 1, 1981                                            3,247

 

                                                             --------

 

 Amount attributable to 3-tax year period                    $ 8,207

 

                                                             =======

 

 Percent of adjustment

 

 attributable to 3-tax year                         8,207

 

                                                   ------

 

 period:                                           11,454     = 71.7%

 

 

In this example, the percent of the section 481(a) adjustment attributable to the 3-tax year period preceding the year of change is more than 67 percent and represents the highest percent of the adjustment attributable to any one of the 1, 2, or 3-tax year periods preceding the year of change. Under the provisions of section 3.04-1(b) of this revenue procedure, the actual section 481(a) adjustment for 1984 of $11,454 shall be taken into account in the amount of $2,737.51 in 1984, 1985, and 1986 (71.7 percent times $11,454 divided by 3, for each of the 3 years) and $1,620.74 in 1987 and 1988 (the remainder from the $11,454 adjustment taken ratably in the two remaining years that the taxpayer used the Rule of 78's method).

Example C

The taxpayer, a commercial bank that reports its income on a calendar year basis, has used the Rule of 78's method to compute interest income on many of its loans for eleven years. Interest income reported by the taxpayer did not exceed the loan payments received by the taxpayer with respect to any loans for which the taxpayer used the Rule of 78's method. In accordance with section 3.02 of this revenue procedure, the taxpayer must change to the "prescribed method" for loans with terms in excess of five years by filing the original of the Form 3115 with its timely filed federal income tax return for either 1983 or 1984, or with an amended return for 1983 filed no later than September 15, 1984. The taxpayer's application must comply with the procedures set forth in section 6.01 of this revenue procedure. The period for taking into account the negative section 481(a) adjustment for 1984 is determined under section 3.06-1 of this revenue precedure. However, the total adjustment period may not exceed three tax years.

Example D

The facts are the same as Example C except that the taxpayer ignores the mandatory requirement of section 3.02 of this revenue procedure, i.e., the taxpayer does not change to the "prescribed method" for either 1983 or 1984. If the taxpayer changes to the "prescribed method" for any year subsequent to 1984, it must comply with sections 3.07 and 6.02 of this revenue procedure and its section 481(a) adjustment must be taken into account ratably over six tax years. See section 3.07.

SEC. 8. MISCELLANEOUS

Where a taxpayer's change in method of accounting falls within the scope set forth in section 1 of this revenue procedure, that taxpayer must use this revenue procedure to effectuate such change in method of accounting and may not use the provisions of Rev. Proc. 80-51, 1980-2 C.B. 818. Thus, the original of the application for permission to change the method of accounting described in this revenue procedure, if filed with the National Office under the general provisions of Rev. Proc. 80-51, will not be considered a valid application. Any such original applications erroneously filed with the National Office will be returned without processing and with instructions to comply with this revenue procedure.

SEC. 9. ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURE FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUAL BORROWERS

Individual borrowers, who previously reported interest expense based upon the Rule of 78's method, may have difficulty computing the amount of interest that economically accrues in order to comply with the provisions of this revenue procedure. Many of these taxpayers may qualify to use the alternative procedure, contained in Rev. Proc. 84-29, for computing allowable interest deductions. One of the requirements that must be met in order to qualify for the alternative procedure contained in Rev. Proc. 84-29 is that the proceeds of the loan were not used for investment purposes or to purchase items in connection with a trade or business. See Rev. Proc. 84-29 for complete details.

SEC. 10. INQUIRIES

Inquiries regarding this revenue procedure may be addressed to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Attention CC:C:C:1, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20224.

DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Cross-Reference

    26 CFR 601.204: Changes in accounting periods and methods of

    accounting.

    (Also Part I, Sections 163, 446, 451, 461, 481, 1381; 1.163-1,

    1.446-1, 1.451-1, 1.461-1, 1.481-1, 1.1381-1.)

  • Code Sections
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    not available
Copy RID