Menu
Tax Notes logo

Canadian Court Notes Decision Against FATCA Agreement Challenge

SEP. 16, 2015

Hillis and Deegan v. Attorney General of Canada

DATED SEP. 16, 2015
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES

Hillis and Deegan v. Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, September 16, 2015 -- A decision was issued today by the Honourable Luc Martineau of the Federal Court in file T-1736-14:

 

IN THE MATTER OF VIRGINIA HILLIS et al v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA et al

 

Summary: The Federal Court has rendered its judgment on the legality of the disclosure of personal and account holder information collected by Canadian financial institutions under Part XVIII of the Income Tax Act [ITA] relating to US reportable accounts held by Canadian citizens or permanent residents who have the status of "US persons". The definition of "US persons" includes, among others, all US citizens (including those who possess dual citizenship with Canada), green card holders, and those who hold joint accounts with an American spouse. This information is scheduled to be disclosed in bulk on or around September 30, 2015, by the Canadian Minister of National Revenue to the US tax authorities, and will likely affect a great number of persons who live in Canada.

Under the Intergovernmental Agreement signed between Canada and the United States [IGA], which facilitates the compliance of Canadian financial institutions with the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act [FATCA], Canada commits to requiring certain Canadian financial institutions to apply specific procedures to identify and disclose information relating to reportable accounts. If Canada meets its obligations in this regard, and if the reporting Canadian financial institutions comply with certain requirements, the US will treat those institutions as complying with FATCA. Financial institutions that do not comply with FATCA reporting requirements will be subject to a thirty percent withholding tax. Pursuant to the Canada-United States Enhanced Tax Information Exchange Agreement Implementation Act, and sections 263 to 269 of the ITA [the impugned provisions], the exchange scheme provided for in the IGA has force of law in Canada.

The Court concludes that the collection and automatic disclosure of personal and accountholder information relating to US reportable accounts from Canadian financial institutions is legally authorized by the impugned provisions, is not inconsistent with the provisions of the Convention between the United States and Canada with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital, and does not otherwise violate section 241 of the ITA, as alleged by the two plaintiffs who possess dual citizenship and have never worked or filed taxes in the US. The declaratory and injunctive relief requested by the plaintiffs in their motion for summary judgment is denied, without prejudice to their right to pursue their claim that the impugned provisions are ultra vires or inoperative because they are unconstitutional or otherwise unjustifiably infringe their Charter rights.

The decision is available in English only, as delay of its issuance would be prejudicial to the public interest. A French language summary of the conclusions is available. A certified translation will be provided at the earliest possible time.

A copy of the decision can be obtained via the Web site of the Federal Court: http://cas-ncr-nter03.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Index

 

Andrew Baumberg

 

Media Contact/Liaison avec les

 

Médias

 

Federal Court/Cour fédérale

 

Tel./Tél.: (613) 947-3177
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
Copy RID