Menu
Tax Notes logo

Farmers' Income Averaging Regs Need to Be Clarified

FEB. 8, 2000

Farmers' Income Averaging Regs Need to Be Clarified

DATED FEB. 8, 2000
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES

 

=============== FULL TEXT ===============

 

February 8, 2000

 

 

The Honorable Lawrence H. Summers

 

Secretary of the Treasury

 

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

 

Washington, D.C. 20220

 

 

The Honorable Charles Rossotti

 

Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service

 

1111 Constitution Avenue, NW

 

Washington, D.C. 20224

 

 

Dear Secretary Summers and Commissioner Rossotti:

[1] In 1997, Congress enacted temporary three-year averaging for farm and ranch income to protect agriculture producers from excessive tax rates in profitable years. In 1998, the provision was made permanent. Congress acted to insert fairness into the tax code to insure that disproportionate taxation of farm income didn't further stress farmers and ranchers already under economic distress.

[2] Farm and ranch income can vary greatly from year to year. Without the ability to average income over a period of time, farmers and ranchers can end up paying a higher effective tax rate than taxpayers with stable incomes with the same aggregate earnings. In years when agriculture production turns a profit, government over- collection of taxes reduces funds farmers need to weather the next economic downturn.

[3] On October 8, 1999, the Internal Revenue Service proposed regulations (REG-21063-97) for averaging farm income under section 1301 of the Internal Revenue Code. The proposed rules fail to make clear that "taxable income" in the farm income averaging formula may be a negative number. While no record of congressional intent exists on the issue of negativity, the purpose of this letter is to inform you that it was the intent of Congress to allow producers to average income for tax purposes over profitable and unprofitable years.

[4] Taxable income is defined in Section 63 of the Internal Revenue Code as adjusted gross income minus allowable deductions. When calculating using this definition taxable income may be a negative number. However, current instructions for income averaging that accompany Schedule J of Form 1040 require that taxable income cannot be less than zero.

[5] We view this interpretation as inconsistent with the intent of Congress and therefore recommend that the proposed IRS regulations be amended to clarify that "taxable income" may be a negative for the purpose of farm income averaging. Thank you for your consideration.

Burns/Kohl Income Averaging,

 

co-signers

 

 

Spencer Abraham

 

Wayne Allard

 

John Ashcroft

 

Max Baucus

 

Robert Bennett

 

Christopher Bond

 

Kent Conrad

 

Paul Coverdell

 

Larry Craig

 

Tom Daschle

 

Mike DeWine

 

Byron Dorgan

 

Richard Durbin

 

Slade Gorton

 

Phil Gramm

 

Rod Grams

 

Charles Grassley

 

Chuck Hagel

 

Tom Harkin

 

Orrin Hatch

 

James Inhofe

 

Tim Johnson

 

Bob Kerrey

 

Blanche Lincoln

 

Patty Murray

 

Chuck Robb

 

Pat Roberts

 

Richard Shelby

 

Gordon Smith

 

Craig Thomas
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
Copy RID