Menu
Tax Notes logo

Firm Seeks Guidance on Mechanics of Qualified Opportunity Zone Funds

JAN. 27, 2019

Firm Seeks Guidance on Mechanics of Qualified Opportunity Zone Funds

DATED JAN. 27, 2019
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES

January 27, 2019

Ms. Erika Reigle
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
Income Tax & Accounting

Re: IRS clarifications on Qualified Opportunity Funds (QOF)

Dear Ms. Reigle:

In the hope that the IRS would consider extending the cutoff date for the Public Comment period to now end 5 workdays after the Government reopens (to make up for the 5 workdays lost prior to December 28, 2018), I am seeking guidance on ten (10) clarifications pertaining to Qualified Opportunity Funds (QOF). In these clarifications, the defined terms for Zone Stock, Zone Partnership Interest, and Zone Business Property as listed in Revised Rule 2018-29 are being used. The requested guidance is as follows:

1. Please allow taxpayers to adjust their Federal Tax Returns after the taxpayer sells their position in their QOF in order to benefit from the provisions outlined in 1400Z-2 subsections (b)(2)(B)(iii & iv).

a. Taxpayers acknowledge that the deferral of the capital gains tax associated with the amount the taxpayer invested in their QOF will expire no later than 12/31/2026. Taxpayers acknowledge they will need to pay the appropriate amount of capital gains tax then. But if the taxpayer still owns their position in the QOF as the date of inclusion, and the taxpayer has not yet held their position for five (5) or seven (7) years at that point in time, there needs to be a way for the taxpayer to enjoy those benefits as outlined in 1400Z-2 subsections (b)(2)(B)(iii & iv) by way of a taxpayer adjustment of their Federal Tax Returns after the taxpayer sells their position in their QOF.

i. If the ability for taxpayers to adjust their Federal Return is not provided, there is a low likelihood of any meaningful amount of taxpayers being able to enjoy the benefits as outlined in 1400Z-2 subsections (b)(2)(B)(iii & iv) because the late date for taxpayers to invest in a QOF to enjoy the combined benefits would be December 31, 2019. It seems that taxpayers that invest in QOFs should have the benefits outlined in 1400Z-2 subsections (b)(2)(B)(iii & iv) available to them all the way leading up to 12/31/2026.

2. Please acknowledge that the “basis” as listed in 1400Z-2 subsection (c) includes land.

a. Please clarify that the process described in Revised Rule 2018-29 where “land” is segregated from the “building” in the calculation of the adjusted basis is exclusively for the determination if a substantial improvement has exceeded the adjusted basis and for no other purpose.

3. Please clarify if Zone Business Property is required to A) be purchased in exchange for cash, and/or B) from an unrelated person.

a. Of the three types of Zone Property, per 1400Z-2 subsections (d)(2)(B & C), both Zone Stock and Zone Partnership Interest are explicitly required to be purchased in exchange for cash from an unrelated person, but per 1400Z-2 subsection (d)(2)(D), Zone Business Property it is not clear if it is required to be purchased in exchange for cash from an unrelated person. Are there other means in which the Zone Business Property may be acquired?

i. Note: in the example in Revised Rule 2018-29, a purchase is indicated, but it does not state either A) a cash purchase, and/or B) from an unrelated person.

4. Please clarify the terms on the “leased” aspects of a qualified opportunity zone business as listed in 1400Z-2 subsection (d)(3)(A)(i).

a. Per 1400Z-2 subsection (d)(2)(D)(i)(I), Zone Business Property is “acquired”. Does this mean that in regards to a qualified opportunity zone business, its tangible property may be leased provided the lease was acquired after December 31, 2017?

5. Please confirm that “land” is considered Zone Business Property.

a. In the 3rd paragraph of the 3rd page of Revised Rule 2018-29, the paragraph questioned if land can constitute Zone Business Property. Revised Rule 2018-29 did not answer this critical question which would pose significant negative consequences to taxpayers if land was not considered Zone Business Property. This is because taxpayers are anticipating the appreciation of the land value to be an important component of tax benefits in their overall investment return.

b. Please clarify that “land” being segregated from the “building” in the calculation of the adjusted basis is exclusively for the determination if a substantial improvement has exceeded the adjusted basis and the segregation is for no other purpose.

6. Please explain how the requirement of “a substantial portion of the intangible property of an opportunity zone business is used in the active conduct of a trade or business in the qualified opportunity zone” could be satisfied in a residential rental project after the substantial improvement has occurred (for example 5 years after the substantial improvement)?

a. This requirement on a Zone Business is listed in 1400Z-2 subsection (d)(3)(A)(ii) which connects to paragraph 4 of section 1397C(b), and is also listed in the 2nd paragraph of the 2nd column of Federal Register page 54295. 

7. Please grant the 31 month safe harbor for working capital to also be applicable to a Zone Business Property.

a. In the proposed regulations in Federal Register page 54284 Section F, the 31 month safe harbor for working capital is only granted to a Zone Business.

8. Please clarify the certification method for a business to be considered a qualified opportunity zone business.

a. Will this certification need to occur on an annual basis?

9. Please confirm that the tax benefits will remain and be valid for the taxpayer that invested in a QOF and held their position in their QOF for at least 10 years even though the QOF may have rolled through a number of consecutive QOZ projects (with potentially some overlap in those projects).

a. Is there a minimum hold time the QOF will need to hold a particular QOZ property?

10. Please clarify how the wind-down of a QOF is to be managed as well as how required reserves in a QOF are to be treated.

a. How are reserves treated in regards to the 90% rule when the QOF still exists as an entity, but has sold the QOZ property and is in “wind-down” mode? How can the 90% rule be satisfied in the situation where the QOF is required to hold reserves for a two-year time period for potential liabilities with the new buyer of the QOZ property, but these reserves are associated with only one of multiple deals managed by the QOF (in a period prior to wind-down mode)?

Gaining clarity on the above items will greatly enhance the understanding of the mechanics on how QOFs are to operate. If you have any questions pertaining to these items, please do not hesitate to contact me via email or phone (padler@ProjectAdvancement.com 602-989-2448). Your time on this is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,

Patrick C. Adler
Project Advancement
Managing Member

DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
Copy RID